Part 7: Interpretation of Hadeeth Khalifatayn by RELIGIOUS DECEIVERS under Microscope


 Exposing the deception of religious deceivers regarding Hadeeth Khalifatayn

In this part we would be focusing on the deception of the religious deceivers(shian e dajjal). But importantly we will be presenting before you the clear signs of one of the most famous characteristic of shiatu dajjal, that is while trying answer Ahlesunnah they start behaving like donkeys, In the sense that they raise such silly and stupid arguments which no person with human brain could.

What kind of people are we going to expose?

Before, we start our refutation we would like to again make our readers aware that what kind of people are we going to refute and expose in this article. The ones to whom we are going to expose here have a lot of characteristics many of which are stated by their own Imams in their own books(eg: Hypocrites, etc), But some important characteristics which can’t be ignored before reading any argument raised by such people are : They are religious liars,  they consider deceiving and lying to be the teachings of their cult, and often they behave in a stupid manner like donkeys.

Here are the proofs on which we base our views that:

1. shiatu dajjal are religious liars and religious deceivers:

Shia infallible Imam in shia hadeeth states:

إذا رأيتم أهل البدع والريب – غير الشيعي أو الشيعي المهتدي – فأظهروا البراءة منهم وأكثروا من سبهم والقول فيهم والوقيعة ، وباهتوهم – اي ابهتوهم بالكذب والبهتان – كي لا يطمعوا في الفساد في الإسلام ويحذرهم الناس )[ تنبيه الخواطر ج 2 ص 162] .
[ وسائل الشيعة ج 11 ص 508] .
[ نهج الإنتصار ص 152] .

Imam Al-sajjad (as) said: If you see people of suspicion and innovation – other than shias or new shia – then show disownment from them and abuse them much, backbit them, make false accusations on them – that is, backbite them by attributing lies on them and make false accusations on them (‘Buhtaan’) …
[tanbiah al-khawatir v.2 p.162 – wasael al-shia v.11 p. 508 – Nahj al-intisaar p.152]

Here is another one:

مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ يَحْيَى عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ الْحُسَيْنِ عَنْ أَحْمَدَ بْنِ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ أَبِي نَصْرٍ عَنْ دَاوُدَ بْنِ سِرْحَانَ عَنْ أَبِي عَبْدِ اللَّهِ ع قَالَ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ ص إِذَا رَأَيْتُمْ أَهْلَ الرَّيْبِ وَ الْبِدَعِ مِنْ بَعْدِي فَأَظْهِرُوا الْبَرَاءَةَ مِنْهُمْ وَ أَكْثِرُوا مِنْ سَبِّهِمْ وَ الْقَوْلَ فِيهِمْ وَ الْوَقِيعَةَ وَ بَاهِتُوهُمْ كَيْلَا يَطْمَعُوا فِي الْفَسَادِ فِي الْإِسْلَامِ وَ يَحْذَرَهُمُ النَّاسُ وَ لَا يَتَعَلَّمُوا مِنْ بِدَعِهِمْ يَكْتُبِ اللَّهُ لَكُمْ بِذَلِكَ الْحَسَنَاتِ وَ يَرْفَعْ لَكُمْ بِهِ الدَّرَجَاتِ فِي الْآخِرَةِ

“The Messenger of Allah (SAWAS) has said, ‘When you after me find people of bid’ah and doubt/suspicion, do disassociation from them and increase your insults to them and accuse them of false things, and oppose them so they may not become greedy in bringing corruption in Islam. You must warn people against them and against learning their bid’ah (innovations). Allah will reward you for this and will raise you darajaat (positions) in the next life.’”

Source: Al-Kulaynee, Al-Kaafee, vol. 2, ch. 159 “Sitting/Associating with Sinful People”, pg. 375, hadeeth # 4

& Majlisi has graded this hadeeth Saheeh in Mir’aat Al-’Uqool, vol. 11, pg. 77

(Shia scholars) al-Ansari and al-Roohani commented on the Hadith (Above) of Imam Abu Abdullah: “The words “Bahitouhum Kay La Yatma’ou” in the Hadith mean accusing them of things and thinking that they have ill intentions which is Haram in the case of dealing with a believer, so one cannot say about the believer things like: “He might be a Kaffir or a Zani”… And it could be left to its apparent form thus it would permissible to LIE to them for a certain benefit.” Shia sources (Kitab al-Makasib by al-Ansari 2/118), (Minhaj al-Fuqahaa 2/228).

Intrestingly Giant shia scholars give fatawas(verdicts) based on these narrations for example Grand Ayatullah Al Khoei’i

سؤال 1245: هل يجوز الكذب على المبدع أو مروج الضلال في مقام الاحتجاج عليه إذا كان الكذب يدحض حجته ويبطل دعاويه الباطلة؟ الخوئي: إذا توقف رد باطله عليه جاز.

Question”1245″: Is it Possible to Lie or produce Arguments which contain Lies when Debating with a person who Is a Follower of Bida’a (Innovation/ they probably mean Sunnis) and a spreader or Dala’la (Ignorance/ us as well) If this Lie would Destroy my Opponent’s Arguments?

Imam Khoei’i Answers: If it will stop his Falsehood then it is Permissible to do So. (Imam Khoei’i, Sirat el Najat, Volume 1, Page 447) (online source)

A similar fatwa was issue by Grand ayatullah sistani:

السؤال: هل يعاقب الله الشخص اذا اجبر على الكذب في مواضع محرجة اذا سئل عنها خاصة اذا كان المقابل يسال كثيرا عن اشياء لاتخصه ؟

الجواب: لايجوز الكذب الا اذا كان لدفع ضرر.

2. Shiatu dajjal are donkeys:

Aboo ‘Abdillah bin Ahmad Muhammad bin Hanbal ash-Shaybaanee said in“as-Sunnah” (Volume 2/ 548 #1276): I was informed by Muhammad bin Yahyaa bin Abee Sameenah who was informed by Ibn Abee Zaaidha from Isma’eel meaning Aboo Khaalid and his father Zakariyaa bin Abee Zaaidha and Maalik ibn Mighwal from ash-Sha’bee: “If the Shee’ah were birds they would be vultures and if they were animals they would be donkeys”

Comment: So the one who stated this reality was ash-Sha’bee ‘Aamir bin Sharaaheel al-Hamdaanee who was born in the caliphate of ‘Umar(ra)  and he is from the trustworthy of the Taabi’een and from the Fuqahaa who died in the year 103 AH.((Taqreeb))

Thus, in this article we will be exposing their lies and deceptions which they made in order to deceive innocent and lay muslims and we will be revealing before you that how they start behaving like donkeys and make some foolish arguments inorder to name it a refutation to Ahlesunah, So please don’t be surprised by seeing that how can people be so stupid and deceptive at the same time, because the fact is that such things are present in their blood. That is why you will find them least bothered even if their lies are exposed and if they are caught red handed while trying to deceive people.

 

Deception (1)

Shiatu dajjal stated:

[Quote] Then, al-Hindi al-Nasibi (لعنه الله) proceeds to LIE upon Allah (تبارك و تعالى) too: Let us carefully look at the first verse:

God is well pleased with the foremost ones of those who left their homes for the cause of God, those who helped them after their arrival in Medina and those who nobly followed these two groups. He has prepared gardens for them wherein streams flow and wherein they will live forever. This, certainly is the supreme triumph.(9:100).

This is the correct translation of the verse:

[Picthall 9:100] And the first to lead the way, of the Muhajirun and the Ansar, and those who followed them IN GOODNESS….

In other words, Allah (تبارك و تعالى) was well-pleased with the foremost in good deeds AMONG the Muhajirun and the Ansar, and is pleased with whoever followed their good deeds.

This phrase and those who nobly followed these two groupswhich al-Hindi al-Nasibi (لعنه الله) has ADDED to the verse does NOT exist. It is HIS OWN FABRICATION. Also, the phrase “in goodness” which is crucial in the verse has been OMITTED by al-Hindi al-Nasibi (لعنه الله)![Quote]

Religious deceivers after trying to deceive others have now eventually deceived their ownself. Let us deal this hilarious slander of religious slanderers and religious liars in a brief manner to let our readers judge that how stupid and ignorant the shiatu dajjal are, and how perfectly the characteristic of behaving like donkeys fits on Shiatu dajjal.

The base of this slander of the shiatu dajjal is the verse we cited in our original article. Here is that verse: {God is well pleased with the foremost ones of those who left their homes for the cause of God, those who helped them after their arrival in Medina and those who nobly followed these two groups. He has prepared gardens for them wherein streams flow and wherein they will live forever. This, certainly is the supreme triumph.(9:100).}

So the dajjalis claimed that this translation of the noble verse of Quran was FABRICATION by us, It was ME(alhindi) who added the phrase “and those who nobly followed these two groups” to the verse of Quran. So let us show you that does this accusation of the shiatu dajjal contains any reality?

We will  surely expose this slander of shiatu dajjal, Inshallah by the Help of Allah. But before that we would like to invite the shiatu dajjal for praying to Allah to send his Curses on the one WHO Fabricated that translation or added phrases to it and omitted parts of it and ALSO on the ONES who falsely ACCUSED US of omitting part of the verse. We pray that same. Ameen.

Here is shock of dajjali’s life :

This translation which we had used in our original article was actually a translation of renowned SHIA translator MUHAMMAD SARWAR. His translation of Quran is also present in popular SHIA website al-shia.org. Readers can surely check this by visiting these links. [Proofs from shia website : Online links (Link 1)  ;  (Link 2) ; Screen Shots (1) , (2) ]

This is the very same SHIA translator who translated one of the most IMPORTANT books of Shia hadeeth, AL KAFI into English. Here is the proof :

So we see that Muhammar sarwar who was a Shia also translated Shia bible Al kafi into English.

So it is actually SHIA translator who ACCORDING to the Shiatu dajjal 1) Fabricated the Quranic verse 2) Added phrase to it, 3) Omitted some words from it. 4) LIED upon Allah.

Ironically its now the dajjalis themselves who are exposing their own scholars, indeed that’s funny. But we pity all those innocent Shiites and non-shiites who had been following the translations for Quran and Al kafi of this Shia translator. Because according to the shiatu dajjal those are fabrications of SHIA translator, who knows what else the shia translator might have added and subtracted from shia narrations and rest of Quran.

So we would like to recommend the Shiatu dajjal to issue a Fatwa against the SHIA translator Muhammad Sarwar, stating that he was a LIAR, a fabricator , etc. So as to warn people, that how dangerous Shias are, oops sorry , We should say, “They should issue Fatwa that this shia translator was a staunch shia, who truly followed the teachings of Shiism , which is lying, fabricating and deceiving”.

And we would be pleased to know what Fatwa the shiatu dajjal would like to give to their own (SHIA) translator regarding the great crimes committed by him. We hope that it doesn’t turns how to be another classical example of double standards from the shiatu dajjal.

Note: We apologize to the shias who admire the translations of Muhammad Sarwar in regards to Quran and ALkafi and those who follow those translations, because its not we who accused him of lying and fabricating its the so called Shias who declared this.

 

Deception (2)

Shiatu dajjal stated:

[Quote] Allah (تبارك و تعالى) was well-pleased with the foremost ones AMONG the Muhajirun and the Ansar. It is NOT all the Muhajirun and the Ansar. Why is that? Also, the verse itself has identified in what sense the foremost ones are foremost. This is the correct translation of the verse:

[Picthall 9:100] And the first to lead the way, of the Muhajirun and the Ansar, and those who followed them IN GOODNESS….

In other words, Allah (تبارك و تعالى) was well-pleased with the foremost in good deeds AMONG the Muhajirun and the Ansar, and is pleased with whoever followed their good deeds. [Quote]

Yes, This verse is directing towards ALL the foremost ones FROM Muhajireen and Ansar and they to be followed in goodness. But when did we say that all of the Ansar and Muhajirun are to be followed? It seems that the religious slanderers following the teachings of their cult slandered us without any reason.

The fact is that the belief of Ahlesunnah is that whether be it a Caliph or Sahaba or Ahlebayt, they all are to be followed in Goodness only, whether it is specifically mentioned or not.

It seems that the characteristic of behaving like donkeys has become a habbit of shiatu dajjal. They based their stupid accusation on the basis of this phrase “and those who nobly followed these two groups” which is found in the translation of their own SHIA TRANSLATOR.  But what these fools didn’t realize is that by the phrase “these two groups” the Shia translator meant “the foremost ones from Muhajirs and Ansar”, NOT all the Muhajirs and Ansar, since the referred ones in the initial part of verse were the foremost ones from Muhajirs and Ansar. Moreover the shia translator translated “بِإِحْسَانٍ”  as “nobly” which literally translates as “WITH goodness” or “WITH good conduct” , which means similar to what shia translator translated, he didn’t omit anything for what the dajjalis accused him.

Moreover even we never used this translation of Shia translator to portray that all the Ansar and Muhajireen are to be followed even in their mistakes. On the contrary Ahlesunnah believes that none of Sahaba nor Ahlebayt were infallible, they were normal human beings and they used to commit mistakes, Thus Ahlesunnah believes that Sahaba are to be followed in their goodness only, whether it is stated or not.

So, Indeed the shiatu dajjal are brainless donkeys, because of their lack of understanding skills , they accused their own SHIA translator for fabricating quranic verse, for adding words in it and for omitting some of its words, for lying on Allah, which turned out to be baseless accusations on poor man, as we have proved. So we hope that the shiatu dajjal will get a high voltage shock from this exposition of their deceptive and idiotic tactics, and we advice them to issue an official apology for Mr. Muhammad Sarwar, the shia translator who unexpectedly became the target of the slanders of religious slanderers and religious liars. Anyways we also know that the shiatu dajjal don’t have the guts to do so, because if they do so, then who will take the other slanders of the dajjalis seriously? Because when the readers will realize that due to enmity with Ahlesunnah the dajjalis have started to falsely accuse their OWN scholars with extremely serious allegations then, they will surely understand that the dajjalis could cross all the limits while doing the same against Ahlsunnah.

May Allah save Muslims from the deceptions of shiatu dajjal.

 

Deception (3)

Shiatu dajjal stated:

[Quote] Yes, the Path of the believers is submission and obedience to the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم).

But, does this Path include Umar and Uthman? That is the crucial question! Well, according to authentic evidence, Umar and Uthman were NOT on the Path of the believers![Quote]

The religious liars and deceivers again tried to attack the beloved friends of Ahlebayt.

The biggest problem for the shiatu dajjal is actually the basic teaching they have got, they think that if someone disobeys Allah or Prophet(Saw) in a certain matter even if being unaware of the command of Prophet(saw) or to avoid a greater Harm or If that person disobeys Allah but later repents, even then the dajjalis accuse that person of deviating from Path and they claim that such person cannot be followed ALTOGETHER.

But this stupidity doesn’t carries any weight and the people who have read the glorious Quran know it very well. The best example which alone is sufficient to destroy the foolish slanders of shiatu dajjal is the example of Prophet Adam(as). Allah states in Quran that Adam(as) disobeyed Allah and later repented yet he remained as a source of guidance for his people and an example to be followed. Thus we find that righteous people can commit mistakes and  sometimes may disobey Allah or Prophet(Saw), but that doesn’t mean that they become deviants.

Now keeping in mind the above facts let us analyze on what basis shiatu dajjal accuse beloved friend of Ahlebayt, (i.e) Umar(ra), Here is the claim of shiatu dajjal:

[Quote]During the lifetime of Umar, he literally REVOKED the Qur’an and Sunnah.

Ibn ‘Abbas (Allah be pleased with them) reported that the (pronouncement) of three divorces during the lifetime of Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) and that of Abu Bakr and two years of the caliphate of Umar (Allah be pleased with him) (was treated) as one. But Umar b. Khattab (Allah be pleased with him) said: Verily the people have begun to hasten in the matter in which they are required to observe respite. So if we had imposed this upon them. And he IMPOSED it upon them. [Sahih Muslim, Book 009, Number 3491][Quote]

Firstly Umar(ra) didn’t initiate a NEW ruling. Secondly that ruling was not applicable to everyone in general but it was for some people in particular. Please notice the words in the narration, “he imposed it upon THEM”, if that command was for everyone in general or if Umar(ra) was changing the Shariah as the dajjalis claim then the wordings should have been like this, “he imposed it upon US”. But since it was for some particular people the narrator(ibn abbas) didn’t narrate it as a general command.

Umar(ra) imposed his Fatwa because of reason he himself said, “Verily the people have begun to hasten in the matter in which they are required to observe respite. Umar ibn Al-Khattab(ra) felt that people were increasingly resorting to a triple divorce at the same time.  He said: “People are precipitating something concerning which they have been given respite. It may be wise to impose it on them.” He proceeded to make that imposition. In other words, Umar wanted to PUNISH THOSE people WHO RESORTED TO A TRIPLE DIVORCE at the same time by making it binding. He did not initiate a new ruling. HE SIMPLY COMMITTED PEOPLE TO WHAT THEY SAID. He made their words binding on them. It is open to a ruler to impose such a punishment. That is the reason why the Prophet’s companions who were alive at the time did not object to Umar’s action. They understood it as a punishment which would be valid for a limited period of time and for particular people. Please refer this [link] for a detailed info inregards to divorce.

The action of Umar(ra) can be understood easily by those who are aware of a general rule in Islamic Jurisprudence, which is “warding off the greater of the two harms and serving the greater of the two interests”. A simple example of this is the issue of abortion, We know that it is haraam to kill the foetus after the soul has been breathed into it( i.e after 120 days since conception) and it is not permissible to kill it under any circumstances, BUT if continuation of the pregnancy will lead to the mother’s death then abortion can be done. Though if we view this from the prespective of shiatu dajjal, then we are changing the shariah by giving the verdict that the child can be killed, but the fact which every unbiased and sane reader can see is that the concession allowing abortion in this case is only allowed in order to ward off the greater of the two harms and serve the greater of the two interests. Thus similar was the case of Umar(ra).

Note: The fact remains that by virtue of being khalifah rashidah, it was his prerogative to make the ijtihad based on the Maslahah Mursalah. We would definately need more info on the practices of the people who newly embraced Islam and perhaps did things that played down the worth of Divorce OR Hajj.Regarding Hajj tamatuu Umar(ra) himself erred on that matter based on his understanding of the issue rather than any deliberate attempt to undermine an established Sunnah (and we know Umar for nothing except his severe adherence to the Sunnah). Yet we find that many senior Sahabah did not take this ijtihad and continued in their preference (rightly so) of Hajj Tamattu’. And there is no authentic evidence that Umar punished anyone who went against his fatwa.

Then the shiatu dajjal try to attack Uthman(ra) due to their ignorance, stating:

[Quote] Al-Bukhari records: Narrated ‘Abdullah bin ‘Umar:I offered the prayer with the Prophet, Abu Bakr and ‘Umar at Mina and it was of two Rakat. ‘Uthman in the early days of his caliphate did the same, but later on he started praying the full prayer.Sahih Bukhari, Volume 2, Book 20, Number 188 [Quote]

In regards to the allegation of shiatu dajjal on Uthman(ra) then , [please refer point 11 on this scan page], it answers the allegation against Uthman(ra).

Anyways we know that the corrupted and damaged dajjali brains cannot understand these issues, unless someone proves to them the similar thing occurring with Ahlebayt, Which will give them a dose to understand the issue and then calm down.

Prophet(saw) said that its haram(forbidden) to punish anyone by burning alive. This is proved from both Sunni and Shia sources:

Shia source: The problem was presented to Imam Ja’far as-Sadiq (a.s.) and he asked her mother which sin she had committed. When the mother confessed, Imam (a.s.) said that earth would never accept her because she used to punish Allah’s creatures with the punishment that only Allah has the right to punish (That is, burning alive). Then Imam (a.s.) told them to place a little turbah in her grave. This was done and then the earth did not convulse when she was buried in it.(Mustanadush Shia) (greater sins the complete book by Ayatullah Abdul Husayn Dastaghaib Shirazi , chapter 53)

Sunni source: Abu Dawud in “Sunnan”: 2667 .Narrated Hamzah al-Aslami: The Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) appointed him commander over a detachment. He said: I went out along with it. He (the Prophet) said: If you find so-and-so, burn him with the fire. I then turned away, and he called me. So I returned to him, and he said: If you find so-and-so, kill him, and do not burn him, for no one punishes with fire except the Lord of the fire. [there are other narrations too which support this hadees]

But we find from both Sunni and Shia sources that Ali(ra) punished people by burning Alive.

Shia source:

عَلِيُّ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ عَنْ أَبِيهِ عَنِ ابْنِ أَبِي عُمَيْرٍ عَنْ هِشَامِ بْنِ سَالِمٍ عَنْ أَبِي عَبْدِ اللَّهِ ع قَالَ أَتَى قَوْمٌ أَمِيرَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ ع فَقَالُوا السَّلَامُ عَلَيْكَ يَا رَبَّنَا فَاسْتَتَابَهُمْ فَلَمْ يَتُوبُوا فَحَفَرَ لَهُمْ حَفِيرَةً وَ أَوْقَدَ فِيهَا نَاراً وَ حَفَرَ حَفِيرَةً أُخْرَى إِلَى جَانِبِهَا وَ أَفْضَى مَا بَيْنَهُمَا فَلَمَّا لَمْ يَتُوبُوا أَلْقَاهُمْ فِي الْحَفِيرَةِ وَ أَوْقَدَ فِي الْحَفِيرَةِ الْأُخْرَى [نَاراً] حَتَّى مَاتُوا

A group came to Ameer Al-Mu’mineen (عليه السلام), and they

said: “Assalaamu `Alayka (Peace be upon you), O our Lord (rabbanaa)! So he asked for their repentance, but they did not repent. So he dug a ditch for them and lit a fire in it and dug a ditch to its other side and conveyed between them. So when they did not repent he threw them in the ditch and lit in the other ditch until they died.

Source: Al-Kulayni, Al-Kaafi, vol. 7, pg. 258-259, hadeeth # 18

Grading:   Al-Majlisi said this hadeeth is Hasan (Good) Mir’aat Al-`Uqool, vol. 23, pg. 401

حدثني محمد بن قولويه، قال حدثني سعد بن عبد الله، قال حدثنا يعقوب بن يزيد و محمد بن عيسى، عن ابن أبي عمير، عن هشام بن سالم، قال : سمعت أبا عبد الله (عليه السلام) يقول و هو يحدث أصحابه بحديث عبد الله بن سبإ و ما ادعى من الربوبية في أمير المؤمنين علي بن أبي طالب، فقال إنه لما ادعى ذلك فيه استتابه أمير المؤمنين (عليه السلام) فأبى أن يتوب فأحرقه بالنار.

Hishaam bin Salim, who said that he heard it from Imam Aboo `Abd Allaah (AS) when he told that `Abd Allaah bin Saba called (to people) the lordship/divinity of Imaam `Alee (AS). Upon that ‘Alee ordered him to repent, but he refused. Then Ali let him burn in fire.”

Source: Al-Kashee, Rijaal, pg. 107, hadeeth # 171. The chain of this narration is one of the most impeccable chains one can get in Shee`ah hadeeth books. This is like  “golden” chain. [narrations provided by Brother Nader Zaveri]

Sunni source: sahi bukhari 4.260: Narrated `Ikrima:Ali burnt some people and this news reached Ibn `Abbas, who said, “Had I been in his place I would not have burnt them, as the Prophet said, ‘Don’t punish (anybody) with Allah’s Punishment.’ No doubt, I would have killed them, for the Prophet said, ‘If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion, kill him.’”

Comment: So we find the example where Ali(ra) did against the command of Prophet(saw), and if the foolish dajjali logic is applied here then the COMMENT made by dajjalis slightly changes, it them becomes “Well, according to authentic evidence, Ali, Umar and Uthman were NOT on the Path of the believers”. Ironically the dajjalis believe that Ali(ra) inherited complete knowledge of Prophet, thus it proves that he commanded that punishment which was against Shariah intentionally. But Ahlesunnah disassociates from such stupidity of shiatu dajjal, according to us Ali(ra) did commit a mistake but that doesn’t means that he deviated from the straight  path as the dajjalis tried to portray in regards to Umar(ra) and Uthman(ra). Its just the false and illogical beliefs of the brainless shiatu dajjal. Thus though Ali(ra) made a mistake but we shouldn’t follow him in that, neither should the shiatu dajjal follow Ali(ra) in that matter, yet we follow Ali(ra) in other matters. Similar is the manner we should deal with the mistakes of Umar(ra) and Uthman(ra).

 

Imams from Ahlebayt advised/declared that Abubakar, Umar, Uthman should be followed:

Here we are going to present some reports which are sufficient to bury the deceptions of Shiatu dajjal that Abubakar(ra), Umar(ra) and Uthman(ra) were deviants and shouldn’t be followed.

1. These were some of the conditions for peace treaty between Hasan(second imam for shias) and Muawiya:

In the name of Allah , the beneficent, the most Merciful. These are the conditions of peace between Hasan bin Ali bin Abi Talib and Muawiya bin Abi Sufyan. The first condition is that you should follow Quran , Sunnah and the seerah of the righteous Caliphs. [Jila ul Ayun, Page 232]

Same thing is also present in Ibn `Aqil, al-Nasa’ih al-Kafiya, p. 156.

Al-Majlisi, Bihar al-Anwar, vol. 10, p. 115.

Similar thing is also present in Kashful ghummah:

سم الله الرحمان الرحيم هذا ما صالح عليه الحسن بن على بن أبي طالب معاوية بن أبي سفيان صالحه على أن يسلم إليه ولاية أمر المسلمين على ان يعمل فيهم بكتاب الله تعالى وسنة رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم وسيرة الخلفاء الراشدين

Ali bin Esa Al-Arbili , Kashaful Ghumma vol. 2, p. 45

Comment: This is a very crucial condition made by hassan(ra) which needs to be pondered over, Hassan(ra) put one of the condition before Muawiya(ra) which stated that he should follow, Quran , sunnah and seerah of righteous caliphs. But the shian e dajjal accuse the 3 righteous caliphs as being innovators and they accuse them of not ruling by Quran and sunnah. So now if what shias say was correct, then why would Hassan(ra) mention that the seerah(biography) of righteous caliph is to be followed ALONG WITH QURAN AND SUNNAH ? Doesn’t this sounds like an oxymoron? If the 3 righteous caliphs rule against what Quran and sunnah teaches then why did Hassan(ra) include them in his condition along with Quran and sunnah? Doesn’t this seems to be two contradictory conditions at one place? But the fact is that this condition itself establishes the reality before unbiased and honest people that neither the 3 righteous caliphs ruled against Quran and sunnah nor were they innovators. That is why hassan(ra) included them to be followed along with Quran and sunnah.

2. Ja’afar bin Muhammad al-Sadiq (rah):

عن عمرو بن قيس الملائي قال : سمعت جعفر بن محمد يقول : برىء الله ممن تبرأ من أبي بكر وعمر . [ حسن ] .

From ‘Amro bin Qays al-Mallaee: I heard Ja’afar bin Muhammad say: “Allah has disassociated himself from those who disassociated themselves from Abu Bakr and ‘Umar.”
Grading: Hasan.

قال الذهبي : قلت: هذا القول متواتر عن جعفر الصادق، أشهد بالله إنه لبار في قوله غير منافق لأحد، فقبح الله الرافضة

Hadith Grading: Imam al Dhahhabi (rah) said while commenting on the narration: This saying is Mutawatir(100% authentic) from Ja’afar al Sadiq, I bear witness in front of Allah that he is honest in his saying and not lying in front of anyone(Taqqiyah), may Allah increase the Rafidah in ugliness.

3. Abdullah ibn Ahmad narrated in his Sunnan(#1303):

حدثني أبي حدثنا محمد بن فضيل حدثنا سالم يعني ابن أبي حفصة قال سألت أبا جعفر وجعفرا عن أبي بكر وعمر رضي الله عنهما فقالا يا سالم تولهما وأبرأ من عدوهما فإنما كانا أمامي هدى وقال لي جعفر يا سالم أبو بكر جدي أيسب الرجل جده قال وقال لي لا نالتني شفاعة محمد  في القيامة إن لم اكن أتولهما وأبرأ من عدوهما

From Salim ibn Abu Hafs: “I asked Abu Jafar and Jafar about Abu Bakr and Umar (may Allah be pleased with them). And they say: “O Salim, befriend to them, and dissolve from their enemies, indeed they were IMAMS OF GUIDANCE” And Jafar said to me: “O Salim, Abu Bakr is my grandfather, does man can abuse his grandfather? And may the intercession of Mohammad not reach me on the day of judgement, if I wouldn’t befriend with them, and wouldn’t dissolve from their enemies”

4. عن سالم بن أبي حفصة قال : سألت أبا جعفر محمد بن علي وجعفر بن محمد عن أبي بكر وعمر عليهما السلام ، فقالا لي : ياسالم تولهما وابرأ من عدوهما فإنهما كانا إمامي هدى . [ حسن ] .

Salim ibn Abi Hafsa that he said: I Asked Abu Ja’afar Muhammad ibn Ali and Ja’afar bin Muhammad about Abu Bakr and ‘Umar peace be upon them and they told me: “Ya Salim, be loyal to them and cut your ties from their enemies as they were two Imams of guidance.“
Grading: Hasan(good).

5. عن بسام بن عبدالله الصيرفي قال : سألت أباجعفر قلت : ماتقول في أبي بكر وعمر رضي الله عنهما ، فقال : والله إني لأتولاهما وأستغفر لهما وما أدركنا أحد من أهل بيتي إلا وهو يتولاهما . [ حسن ] .

From Bassam bin Abdullah al-Sayrafi: I asked Abu Ja’afar: What do you say about Abu bakr and ‘Umar may Allah be pleased with them? He replied: “By Allah I am loyal to them and I ask Allah to forgive them and we never met anyone from my family who was not loyal to them.“
Grading: Hasan.

6. عن عيسى بن دينار المؤذن مولى عمرو بن الحارث الخزاعي قال : سألت أباجعفر عن أبي بكر وعمر فقال : مسلمين رحمهما الله .
فقلت له : أتولاهما وأستغفر لهما .
فقال : نعم .
قلت : أتأمرني بذلك .
قال : نعم ثلاثاً ، فما أصابك فيهما فعلى عاتقي ، وقال بيده على عاتقيه ،
وقال : كان بالكوفة علي رضي الله عنه خمس سنين فما قال لهما إلا خيراً ولا قال لهما أبي إلا خيراً ولا أقول إلا خيراً . [ صحيح ] .

From Isa bin Dinar al-Muatthin the mawla of ‘Amro bin al-Harith al-Khuza’ee: I asked Abu Ja’afar about Abu bakr and ‘Umar and he answered: Muslims may Allah have mercy on them. I told him: Should I be loyal to them and ask Allah to forgive them? He said: Yes. I said: Do you order me to do so? He said: Yes, Yes, Yes (three times) and I take responsibility for what I say. He continued saying: Ali may Allah be pleased with him was in al-Kufa for five years and he always spoke good of them and so did my father and so do I.
Grading: Sahih.

7. Most valuable shia hadeeth book states:

أبو بصير: كنت جالساً عند أبي عبد الله عليه السلام إذ دخلت علينا أم خالد التي كان قطعها يوسف بن عمر تستأذن عليه. فقال أبو عبد الله عليه السلام: أيسرّك أن تسمع كلامها؟ قال: فقلت: نعم، قال: فأذن لها. قال: وأجلسني على الطنفسة، قال: ثم دخلت فتكلمت فإذا امرأة بليغة، فسألته عنهما (أي أبى بكر وعمر) فقال لها : توليهما، قالت : فأقول لربي إذا لقيته : إنك أمرتني بولايتهما؟ قال : نعم” ["الروضة من الكافي" ج8 ص101 ط إيران تحت عنوان "حديث أبي بصير مع المرأة"].

A woman came to Ja`far As-Sadiq – the Six Imam – and asked him about Abu Bakr and
`Umar; whether to give them her loyalty. “Yes,” he said. “And when I meet my Lord, shall I say that you told me to follow them?” she inquired. Again, he said, “Yes.[Al-Kulaynî Muhammad Ibn Ya`qûb Al-Kulaynî Ar-Râzî (d. 328/939), Al-Kâfî, Ar-Rawdah, 8:101.]

Regarding the above book: Sharaf Al Din Musawi said: “Al-Kafi, Al-Tahzeeb, Al-Istibsar, and Mun La Yahdu-Ruhu Al-Faqih are Mutawatirah (100% accurate) and agreed on the accuracy of its contents (the Hadiths), and Al-Kafi is the oldest, greatest, best and the most accurate one of them.” (The book of Al-Muraja’aat, Muraj’ah number 110). We hope the dajjalis remember  the rule of Mutawattir, which they tried to use against Ahlesunnah.

 

Deception (4)

Shiatu dajjal stated:

[Quote] III. SUNNIS ARE NOT THE PARTY OF ALLAH

Allah has described the saved sect as His Party in the Qur’an:[al-hilali and khan 5:55-56] Verily, your Wali (Protector or Helper) is Allah, His Messenger, and the believers, – those who perform As-Salat (Iqamat-as-Salat), and give Zakat, and they bow down (submit themselves with obedience to Allah in prayer). And whosoever takes Allah, His Messenger, and those who have believed, as Protectors, then the Party of Allah will be the victorious.

And:

[al-hilali and khan 58:22] You (O Muhammad SAW) will not find any people who believe in Allah and the Last Day, making friendship with those who oppose Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad SAW), even though they were their fathers, or their sons, or their brothers, or their kindred (people). For such He has written Faith in their hearts, and strengthened them with Ruh (proofs, light and true guidance) from Himself. And We will admit them to Gardens (Paradise) under which rivers flow, to dwell therein (forever). Allah is pleased with them, and they with Him. They are the Party of Allah. Verily, it is the Party of Allah that will be the successful.

These two verses have described the Party of Allah with these characteristics:

1.         They accept none as their Wali (Protector and Helper) except Allah, the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) and the obedient believers and worshippers.

2.         They do tawalla of (i.e. they love and pray for) the friends of Allah, whomsoever they are, and do tabarra (i.e hate and curse) the opponents of Allah, whomsoever they are![Quote]

Indeed this is ironical because in previous arguments that dajjalis wanted to portray that WALI means MASTER/CALIPH, but now since it was used for the obedient believers too they preferred the translation for this word as PROTECTOR AND HELPER.  Anyways what is the important point to ponder over here is that shiatu dajjal tried to portray that there exists some of the teachings of their satanic cult in the noble verse of Quran which they cited. But the fact is that there is no mentioned of doing TABARRA which dajjalis describes as HATING AND CURSING in the noble verse of Quran.

The verse just states that true believers never love the ones who oppose Allah and his messenger. It doesn’t states that believers should CURSE those who oppose Allah and his prophet(Saw). Those are the deceptive interpretations of the dajjalis.

The shiatu dajjal then stated:

[Quote] Let us ask Sunnis: is it true that all your leaders in history are obedient servants and worshippers?[Quote]

Then they quoted the incorrect and unreliable fatwa of sheikh uthman al khamis, because Muawiya(ra) never considered himself to be a righteous Caliph. He used to include himself among the first of kings, we have discussed in Part 6 of this series of refutations.

Then in accordance to that erroneous fatwa Shiatu dajjal try to attack Muawiya(ra), They stated:

[Quote] Narrated ‘Ikrima: Ibn ‘Abbas said to me and to his son ‘Ali, “Go to Abu Sa’id and listen to what he narrates.” So we went and found him in a garden looking after it. He picked up his Rida’, wore it and sat down and started narrating till the topic of the construction of the mosque reached. He said, “We were carrying one adobe at a time while ‘Ammar was carrying two. The Prophet saw him and started removing the dust from his body and said, “May Allah be Merciful to ‘Ammar. The rebellious group will murder him. He will be inviting them (i.e. his murderers, the rebellious group) to Paradise AND THEY WILL INVITE HIM TO HELL-FIRE.” ‘Ammar said, “I seek refuge with Allah from affliction.”Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 8, Number 438 [Quote]

Alhafith Ibn hajar said explaining this narration: “He (i.e. Ammar) was calling the other group to Jannah in the meaning he was calling them to the reason that lead to Jannah. He was calling to obey the ruler while the other group was not. Yet, they are excused as they thought they were calling for Jannah as well and had an Ijtihaad about the matter”.

We know that every act of a person which is Haram leads him hells fire, be it listening music or consuming alcohol etc, unless he repents from it. Rebelling against the Caliph is haram, but the excuse of the sahabah is that they had mistaken ijtihad. (The decision was still wrong though).  Similar thing can be said regarding Ali(ra) who burnt people alive as a punishment due to his incorrect ijtihad. Moreover Sahaba of Prophet(saw) spend their lives asking forgiveness from Allah for the errors they committed knowingly or unknowingly.

But deceptively the dajjalis tries an intellectual fraud, they quote the verse of Quran and try to portray as though Muawiya(ra) was an infidel.(Nauzbillah). Shiatu dajjal stated:

[Quote] In other verses, Allah states that it is the INFIDELS that invite to the Fire:

[al-hilali and khan 40:41-42] “And O my people! How is it that I call you to salvation while YOU CALL ME TO THE FIRE!  YOU INVITE ME TO DISBELIEVE IN ALLAH (AND IN HIS ONENESS), AND TO JOIN PARTNERS IN WORSHIP WITH HIM; of which I have no knowledge, and I invite you to the All-Mighty, the Oft-Forgiving!

And:

[al-hilali and khan 2:221] And do not marry Al-Mushrikat (idolatresses, etc.) till they believe (worship Allah Alone). And indeed a slave woman who believes is better than a (free) Mushrikah (idolatress, etc.), even though she pleases you. And give not (your daughters) in marriage to Al-Mushrikun till they believe (in Allah Alone) and verily, a believing slave is better than a (free) Mushrik (idolater, etc.), even though he pleases you. THOSE (AL-MUSHRIKUN) INVITE YOU TO THE FIRE, but Allah invites (you) to Paradise and Forgiveness by His Leave, and makes His Ayat (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) clear to mankind that they may remember.[Quote]

This is what we call as intellectual fraud by the shiatu dajjal, they tried to imply that since the same words were used in Quran in regards for Infidels or Polytheists, which was used for the rebellious group who killed Ammar(ra) then even these people were infidels and Mushriks. But before destroying this deception of Dajjalis from the words of their own Imams. We would like to clear before our readers that its not always necessary that the words which were used for a particular scenario may mean the same always, for each and every scenario. No, this is not correct, because the meanings of words and their interpretation differs as the scenario changes. But if the dajjalis want to deny this fact then here is an example, just see what it turns out if we apply the dajjali logic.

Allah states the following regarding Zalimin:

Will you then take him (Iblis) and his offspring as protectors and helpers rather than Me while they are enemies to you What an evil is the exchange for the Zalimun (18:50).

And

Allah will cause the Zalimin to go astray and Allah does what He wills.(14: 27).

And:

Verily, there is a painful torment for the Zalimin . (14:22)

But can this be applied to all the places where the word Zalimin was used? Similar to what the dajjalis have done?

Lets see:

We said: “O Adam! Dwell you and your wife in the Paradise and eat both of you freely with pleasure and delight , of things therein wherever you will, but come not near this tree or you both will be of the Zalimin. (2:35).. but Later Quran states that “Then he caused them to fall by deceit; so when they tasted of the tree” Quran (7:22)

And Dhun-Nun(prophet younus), when he went off in anger, and imagined that We shall not punish him! But he cried through the darknesses (saying): “There is no God but You, Glorified be You! Truly, I have been of the Zalimin.(21:87)

Keep in mind that the ones mentioned above were Prophets of Allah. So respected readers did you see that what will happen if we go along with the deceptive tactics of shiatu dajjal? We will end up applying the meanings which were to be applied to polytheists and infidels to noble Prophets of Allah(May Allah forbid). Though the fact is that when the word Zalimin was used for Prophets of Allah, it was no where related to the way it is to be applied for polytheists and infidels, neither was the acts or beliefs of Prophets(for whom Zalimin was used) similar to that of Polytheists.(Ma’azallah).  Similar is the case of Muawiya(ra), the words present there aren’t to be interpreted the way deceptive dajjalis try to portray, So please beware of their deceptions since its from the teachings of their cult to deceive people, so they always tend to use such deceptive arguments inorder to deceive lay people. May Allah save people from the deceptions of Shiatu dajjal.

 

After clearing the misconception let us shatter the deception of shiatu dajjal from the words of their own Imams:

We find that the dajjalis tried to portray that Muawiya(ra) was an infidel or polytheist, so let us bring before you what was the view of Imams of shias regarding this matter and importantly it seems that the shia imams never understood Quran or Hadith the way dajjalis tried to portray above, they understood it the same way as Ahlesunnah does, Proving that they too possessed the beliefs of Ahlesunnah and not those of the deceptive shiatu dajjal.

1. In Sunan Bayhiqi it is narrated that on the eve of the war of Jamal, Ali(ra) was asked about the opponents: “Are they Mushrikeen?” He replied:”They have run from shirk and come into Islaam” Then he was asked “Are they Munafiqeen?” He replied “Munafiqeen are those who don’t remember Allah, except a little (while the opponents do a lot of Zikr)” Then he was asked “Then what are they?” He replied:”They are our brothers who have rebelled from us” [Sunun Bayhiqi - Dairat ul Ma'arif edition page 173 vol 8]

2.

عن جعفر الصادق عن أبیه علیهما السلام أن علیا علیه السلام لم یكن ینسب أحداً من أهل حربة إلى الشرك ولا إلى النفاق، ولكنه كان یقول: هم إخواننا بغوا علینا

Jafar Sadiq narrates from his father (Baqir) that Ali never accused the ones with whom he fought of Shirk (i.e polytheism) or hypocrisy, rather he would say , they are our brothers who  rebelled against us. [(shia books) Wasail Shia, 15/83 , also Qurbul Asnad p. 45, Majleese reported in “Biharal anwar” 32/324]

Comment: These were the views of Ahlebayt regarding those who fought with them , they considered them muslims, unlike what the shian e dajjal want to portray,  Since you will find the shian e dajjal making takfeer of those who fought with Ahlebayt.

3. فلقد كنا مع رسول الله صلى
الله عليه وآله وإن القتل ليدور على الآباء والابناء والاخوان والقرابات ،
فما نزداد على كل مصيبة وشدة إلا إيمانا ، ومضيا على الحق ، وتسليما
للامر ، وصبرا على مضض الجراح . ولكنا إنما أصبحنا نقاتل إخواننا
في الاسلام على ما دخل فيه من الزيغ والاعوجاج والشبهة والتأويل

Hz ali addressing his companions and his opponents said: We were with prophet(saw) , that time our fathers and sons were killed , our near one and brothers were killed ,but after every problem and calamity our eman used to get increase. We used to standstill on truth, We used to obey the commands, at times of difficulties we used to do sabr(patience). But now we are fighting our own muslim brothers.(nahjul balagha tahqeeq subhi saleh, page 179)

4.

واوصيكم عباد الله بتقوى الله، فإنها خير ما تواصى به، وخير عواقب الأمور عند الله، وقد فتح باب الحرب بينكم وبين أهل القبلة
Hz ali said: O servants of Allah I suggest you of having taqwa.This is one of the best suggestion given to servants of Allah. With this you will achieve goodness and piousness. Between you and ahle qibla the door of battle have opened.(nahjul balagha tahqeeq subhi saleh, page 248, sermon 172)

Comment: similar explain as we find in last comment can be applied to these narrations of Nahjul balagha.

5. Sahi bukhari 4.823: Narrated Abu Bakra: Once the Prophet brought out Al−Hasan and took him up the pulpit along with him and said, “This son of mine is a Saiyid (i.e. chief) and I hope that Allah will help him bring about reconciliation between two Muslim groups.”

Comment: This narration is referring to the group of Muawiya(ra) and Ali(ra) as Muslim groups.

Crucial point to ponder: From the above narrations we find that the group of Ali(ra) as well as group of Muawiya(ra) were considered as Muslims. Prophet(saw) didn’t say just one of them will be muslim. But said both of the groups will be muslim. Now some of the notorious shian e dajjal might try to say that, the group of Muawiya(ra) was muslim but they were not momin(belivers), since muslim even encompasses hypocrites some times. To those shian e dajjal we want to say that, hypocrisy is something which is portraying the opposite which is in hearts. So when Muawiya(ra) fought Ali(ra) do you mean to say that he had love for him in his heart? which is opposite to his action? Secondly, if we read Islamic history we will find that there used to be hypocrites among the muslims as the quran says, but when they revealed their true faces and they joined the kuffar(disbelievers) during war, then you will never find that people still called them muslims. So when muawiya(ra) openly went against Ali(ra), yet prophet(Saw) said his group was Muslim, then it means that they all were believers(momineen). Unlike what shian e dajjal want to portray. And if shian e dajjal disagree with us, then we demand them to show us a single authentic narration where any hypocrite OPENLY went against prophet(Saw), and fought against him. Then even AFTER that prophet(Saw) called such a person Muslim. If they can’t then they should stop fooling ignorant people.

Another Important proof which shows that Muawiya(ra) followed Quran and Sunnah:

Shia book Kashaful ghummah

سم الله الرحمان الرحيم هذا ما صالح عليه الحسن بن على بن أبي طالب معاوية بن أبي سفيان صالحه على أن يسلم إليه ولاية أمر المسلمين على ان يعمل فيهم بكتاب الله تعالى وسنة رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم وسيرة الخلفاء الراشدين

The conditions of peace between Hasan and Muawiya are described: In the name of Allah , the beneficent, the most Merciful. These are the conditions of peace between Hasan bin Ali bin Abi Talib and Muawiya bin Abi Sufyan. The first condition is that you should follow Quran , Sunnah and the seerah of the righteous Caliphs.

Ali bin Esa Al-Arbili , Kashaful Ghumma vol. 2, p. 45

Same thing is also present in Ibn `Aqil, al-Nasa’ih al-Kafiya, p. 156.

Similar reports are present in Al-Majlisi, Bihar al-Anwar, vol. 10, p. 115.. Jila ul Ayun, Page 232

Comment: Now these were the conditions of treaty, had it been that Muawiya(ra) would have violated it, then surely Hassan(ra) would have considered that the treaty was nullified and he would have either retaliated or would have fought him. For about 10 years Hassan(ra) remained alive after this treaty, he not complaining about conditions of treaty being violated and no action from him(if that happened) clearly shows that, Muawiya(ra) followed those conditions made in the treaty. We know that Prophet(saw) too made a treaty with kuffar, but everyone knows what happened when disbelievers violated the treaty.

To end this up let us present before you the view of Ali(ra) from the most sacred book of shias:

وَكَانَ بَدْءُ أَمْرِنَا أَنَّا الْتَقَيْنَا وَالْقَوْمُ مِنْ أَهْلِ الشَّامِ، وَالظَّاهِرُ أَنَّ رَبَّنَا وَاحِدٌ (1) ، وَنَبِيَّنَا وَاحِدٌ، وَدَعْوَتَنَا فِي الْإِِسْلاَمِ وَاحِدَةٌ، لاَ نَسْتَزِيدُهُمْ (2) فِي الْإِيمَانِ باللهِ وَالتَّصْدِيقِ بِرَسُولِهِ، وَلاَ يَسْتَزِيدُونَنَا: الْأَمْرُ وَاحِدٌ، إِلاَّ مَا اخْتَلَفْنَا فِيهِ مِنْ دَمِ عُثْمانَ، وَنَحْنُ مِنْهُ بَرَاءٌ! فَقُلْنَا: تَعَالَوْا نُدَاوِ مَا لاَ يُدْرَكُ الْيَوْمَ بِإِطْفَاءِ النَّائِرَةِ (3) ، وَتَسْكِينِ الْعَامَّةِ، حَتَّى يَشْتَدَّ الْأَمْرُ وَيَسْتَجْمِعَ، فَنَقْوَى عَلَى وَضْعِ الْحَقِّ مَوَاضِعَهُ. فَقَالُوا: بَلْ نُدَاوِيهِ بِالْمُكَابَرَةِ (4) ! فَأَبَوْا حَتَّى جَنَحَتِ (5) الْحَرْبُ وَرَكَدَتْ (6) ، وَوَقَدَتْ (7) نِيرَانُهَا وَحَمِشَتْ (8) . فَلَمَّا ضَرَّسَتْنَا (9) وَإِيَّاهُمْ، وَوَضَعَتْ مَخَالِبَهَا فِينَا وَفِيهِمْ، أَجَابُوا عِنْدَ ذلِكَ إِلَى الَّذي دَعَوْنَاهُمْ إِلَيْهِ، فَأَجَبْنَاهُمْ إِلَى مَا دَعَوْا، وَسَارَعْنَاهُمْ (10) إِلَى مَا طَلَبُوا، حَتَّى اسْتَبَانَتْ عَلَيْهِمُ الْحُجَّةُ، وَانْق َطَعَتْ مِنْهُمُ الْمَعْذِرَةُ. فَمَنْ تَمَّ عَلَى ذلِكَ مِنْهُمْ فَهُوَ الَّذِي أَنْقَذَهُ اللهُ مِنَ الْهَلَكَةِ، وَمَنْ لَجَّ وَتَمَادَى فَهُوَ الرَّاكِسُ (11) الَّذِي رَانَ (12) اللهُ عَلَى قَلْبِهِ، وَصَارَتْ دَائِرَةُ السَّوْءِ عَلَى رَأْسِهِ

“In the beginning of our matter, the people of Sham(Muawiya and his supporters) and us met. It is obvious that our God is one, our Prophet is one, and our call in Islam is one. We do not see ourselves more in faith in Allah or more in believing His messenger than them, nor they do. Our matter is one, except for our disagreement in Uthman’s blood, and we are innocent from his murder.“ [Nahjul Balagha, vol.3, p.648; letter 58]

Comment: We find here that Ali(ra) confirmed that the beliefs of both the groups was same. He didn’t mention that they differed in faith. This proves that both were from the same faith and they held the same beliefs like that of AHLESUNNAH.

Deception (5)

Shiatu dajjal stated:

[Quote] Shaykh al-Albani in his Silsilah al-Ahadith al-Sahihah, vol. 5, p. 18, Number 2008 records a relevant Hadith:

قاتل عمار و سالبه في النار.

The killer and plunderer of Ammar will be in the Fire.

Mu’awiyah and his entire army, which included hundreds, if not thousands, of the Sahabah opposed Allah and His Messenger. Yet, Sunnis befriend them and invoke blessings upon them. [Quote]

Though the answer for the previous deception was sufficient to destroy the arguments of Shiatu dajjal, but let us  crush even this misconception of the dajjalis.

Firstly Sheikh Albani is not infallible , like every scholar he too makes mistakes sometimes, and this time he made a mistake, which was beautifully explained and corrected by Shaykh Irshadul Athari, because the narration which was quoted by shiatu dajjal is weak and Munkar. Refer this link:   Is the killer of Ammar ibn Yasir going to hell?

Secondly, what is interesting that the ignorant shiatu dajjal again displayed an example of their stupidity. They claim that:

[Quote] Mu’awiyah and his entire army, which included hundreds, if not thousands, of the Sahabah opposed Allah and His Messenger. Yet, Sunnis befriend them and invoke blessings upon them[Quote]

Let us teach the dajjali donkeys that the number of companions who took part in the Fitnah between Ali and people of Sham were 40. Not hundreds or thousands as the dajjali dreams. Moreover we don’t know that how many of those sahaba from 40 were with Ali, it could be that, majority of them were with Ali(ra).

The Fitnah between Ali RAA and The Muslims of Al Sham, Who took part in it?

-عن أيوب السختياني ، عن محمد بن سيرين أنه قال : لما حدثت الفتنة كان عدد الصحابة عشرة آلاف ، لم يخف منهم أربعون رجلا. معمر بن راشد : الجامع ، ج 11ص: 357 واسنادها صحيح.

From Ayyub al Sikhtiyani from Muhammad bin Sirin that he said: When the fitnah happened the number of companions was ten thousand, Only forty men took part. Source: Mu’amar bin Rashed: Al Jami’i 11/357, Isnad is Sahih

For more of such reports refer this link:The Fitnah between Ali RAA and The Muslims of Al Sham, Who took part in it?

 

Deception (6)

Shiatu dajjal stated:

[Quote] According to al-Hindi al-Nasibi (لعنه الله), the most evil sect is that which calls people to the Ahl al-Bayt (عليهم السلام) and insult Abubakr and Umar!

It is authentically narrated that Imam Ali (عليه السّلام) and al-Abbas INSULTED both Abubakr and Umar, according to Sunni standards! Imam Muslim records:

It is reported by Zuhri that this tradition was narrated to him by Malik b. Aus who said: Umar b. al-Khattab sent for me and I came to him when the day had advanced. I found him in his house sitting on his bare bed-stead, reclining on a leather pillow. He said (to me): “Malik, some people of your tribe have hastened to me (with a request for help). I have ordered a little money for them. Take it and distribute it among them.” I said: “I wish you had ordered somebody else to do this job.” He said: “Malik, take it (and do what you have been told).” At this moment (his man-servant) Yarfa’ came in and said: “Commander of the Faithful, what do you say about Uthman, Abd al-Rabman b. ‘Auf, Zubair and Sa’d (who have come to seek an audience with you)?” He said: “Yes, and permitted them.” So they entered. Then he (Yarfa’) came again and said: “What do you say about ‘Ali and Abbas (who are present at the door)?” He said: “Yes,” and permitted them to enter. Abbas said: “Commander of the Faithful, decide (the dispute) between me and this sinful, treacherous, dishonest liar (Ali).” The people (who were present) also said: “Yes, Commander of the Faithful, do decide (the dispute) and have mercy on them.” Malik b. Aus said: “I could well imagine that they had sent them in advance for this purpose (by ‘Ali and Abbas).” ‘Umar said: “Wait and be patient. I adjure you by Allah by Whose order the heavens and the earth are sustained, don’t you know that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: ‘We (prophets) do not have any heirs; what we leave behind is (to be given in) charity?’” They said: “Yes.” Then he turned to Abbas and ‘Ali and said: “I adjure you both by Allah by Whose order the heavens and earth are sustained, don’t you know that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: ‘We do not have any heirs; what we leave behind is (to be given in) charity?’” They (too) said: “Yes.” (Then) Umar said: “Allah, the Glorious and Exalted, had done to His Messenger (may peace be upon him) a special favor that He has not done to anyone else except him.” He quoted the Quranic verse: “What Allah has bestowed upon His Apostle from (the properties) of the people of township is for Allah and His Messenger.” The narrator said: “I do not know whether he also recited the previous verse or not.” Umar continued: “The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) distributed among you the properties abandoned by Banu Nadir. By Allah, he never preferred himself over you and never appropriated anything to your exclusion. (After a fair distribution in this way) this property was left over.

“The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) would meet from its income his annual expenditure, and what remained would be deposited in the Bait-ul-Mal.” (Continuing further) he said: “I adjure you by Allah by Whose order the heavens and the earth are sustained. Do you know this?” They said: “Yes.” Then he adjured Abbas and ‘All as he had adjured the other persons and asked: “Do you both know this?” They said: “Yes.” He said: “When the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) passed away, Abu Bakr said: ‘I am the successor of the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him).’ Both of you came to demand your shares from the property (left behind by the Messenger of Allah).” (Referring to Hadrat ‘Abbas), he said: “You demanded your share from the property of your nephew, and he (referring to ‘Ali) demanded a share on behalf of his wife from the property of her father. Abu Bakr (Allah be pleased with him) said: ‘The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) had said: We do not have any heirs; what we leave behind is (to be given in) charity.’ So both of you (Ali and Abbas) thought him (Abu Bakr) to be a liar, sinful, treacherous, and dishonest. And Allah knows that he was true, virtuous, well-guided and a follower of truth. When Abu Bakr passed away and (I have become) the successor of the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) and Abu Bakr (Allah be pleased with him), you (Ali and Abbas) thought me (Umar) to be a liar, sinful, treacherous, and dishonest. And Allah knows that I am true, virtuous, well-guided and a follower of truth. I became the guardian of this property. Then you as well as he came to me. Both of you have come and your purpose is identical. You said: Entrust the property to us. I said: If you wish that I should entrust it to you, it will be on the condition that both of you will undertake to abide by a pledge made with Allah that you will use it in the same way as the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) used it. So both of you got it.” He said: “Wasn’t it like this?” They said: “Yes.” He said: “Then you have (again) come to me with the request that I should adjudge between you. No, by Allah. I will not give any other judgment except this until the arrival of the Doomsday. If you are unable to hold the property on this condition, return it to me.” Sahih Muslim Book 019, Number 4349

Is declaring Abubakr and Umar to be liars, sinful, treacherous and dishonest one of the traits of this evil sect?

Did the Sunni versions of Imam Ali  and al-Abbas belong to this evil sect?[Quote]

Firstly before answering the tricky arguments of the shiatu dajjal, let us bring your attention to some important facts present in this narration which will never go down the throat of the dajjalis. If we read the complete narration which the shiatu dajjal deliberately didn’t quote then following points are found(though while quoting dajjalis we provided the complete narration).

1. We find that Ali(ra) went to Abubakar(ra) and Umar(ra) asking for his wife’s(Fatima) share from her father’s(Prophet) property. But we don’t find Ali(ra) going to these people to demand his Caliphate. Had it been that Caliphate was the right of Ali(ra) and it was wrongfully taken away by Abubakar(ra) as the shiatu dajjal claim, then why didn’t Ali(ra) approached Abubakar(ra) or Umar(ra) inorder to Claim his right? Was asking share of property MORE IMPORTANT for Ali(ra)than asking the right of Caliphate? The only reasonable answer to this is that Caliphate was never the right of Ali(ra), had it been so then he would have surely approached Abubakr(ra) or Umar(ra) demanding that, because guidance of Ummah is more important than the personal matter of Ali(ra). So how could Ali(ra) approach Abubakr(ra) for asking things related to personal matters but not related to religious. This proof just destroys the false claims of shiatu dajjal that Ali(ra) was appointed as Caliph.

2. Umar turned to Abbas and ‘Ali and said:“I adjure you both by Allah by Whose order the heavens and earth are sustained, don’t you know that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: ‘We do not have any heirs; what we leave behind is (to be given in) charity?’” They said:YES.”

3. The property was Managed by Abubakar(ra) and Umar(ra) IN THE SAME WAY as it was managed by PROPHET(SAW). Ali(ra) acknowledged this. (refer bukhari hadees 2884).

4. More stronger version of this incident DOESN’T contains the words “words liar, sinful, treacherous and dishonest”,  as evident from Sahi bukhari(hadeeth No. 2884), which is more stronger , this narration can be read from this [link]

5. MOST IMPORTANTLY, even if we take the weaker version of this narration from Sahi Muslim, leaving the stronger version of Sahi Bukhari, Yet we find that the words Liar, sinful, treacherous WEREN’T uttered by Ali(ra). So from where did the brainless dajjalis claim that Ali(ra) insulted Abubakar and Umar? Indeed the dajjalis are donkeys.

Those words were said firstly by Abbas(ra) FOR ALI(RA) and then by Umar(ra), but Ali(ra) never uttered those words. Now let us explain that why Umar(ra) had to use those words.

Firstly it was Abbas who referred to Ali as “liar, sinful, treacherous, and dishonest.” Therefore, Umar repeated the words of Abbas verbatim in order to prove a point. Umar was making use of rhetoric. The problem is that the Shiatu dajjal have no hold of Arabic Balagha. If they did, they would know that direct translation in English would not give the proper understanding. If we apply the Arabic Balagha, the phrase actually means: “So you both thought Abu Bakr was a liar, sinful, treacherous, and dishonest?” This is an example of reductio ad absurdum. Reductio ad absurdum (Latin: “reduction to the absurd”) also known as an apagogical argument(reductio ad impossibile, or proof by contradiction) is a type of logical argument where one assumes a claim for the sake of argument, derives an absurd or ridiculous outcome, and then concludes that the original assumption must have been wrong as it led to an absurd result. The following dialogue is an example of reductio ad absurdum:

Father- Why did you start smoking?
Daughter – All my friends were doing it.
Father- You’re saying that if all your friends jumped off a cliff, you would do that too?

In this case, Umar used the exact same words (i.e. verbatim) that Abbas used for Ali in order to make a point. Umar was basically saying: “If you think Ali is such-and-such, then you must also think that Abu Bakr and Umar are also that?”

Another analogy of this is a mother and a father who had told their two sons that the capitol of France was Paris. A few days later, the two sons get in an argument over the capitol of France. One brother says the capitol is Berlin, whereas the other says the capitol is London. When they go to their father to arbitrate over this matter, one brother says about the other: “Father, can you settle this dispute of mine with my idiot brother who thinks the capitol of France is Berlin?” The father is not appalled at the fact that his two little sons forgot the capitol of France; this is a mistake that anybody can make. But what he is appalled at is the language used by this son, calling his brother an “idiot.” The father then says: “So you thought of Mom as an idiot when she said that Paris was the capitol of France, and you thought I was an idiot when I said that too?” By saying this, the father is trying to dissuade the son from jumping to conclusions about his brother’s character, because in such a process, he would also believe his mother and father to be idiots as well.

Umar was simply repeating the words of Abbas verbatim. How can the Shiatu dajjal ignore this “coincidence” especially in light of Arabic Balagha? It is obvious from this that Umar was proving a point, and his words should thus be analyzed in this context.

So we find that the claim of Shiatu dajjal that it was Ali who called Abu Bakr and Umar to be a “liar, sinful, treacherous, and dishonest” was THEIR OWN SELF MADE CLAIM, inorder to deceive people. But the reality is that, it was merely Umar who said that Abbas was implying this.

6. When Ali (رضّى الله عنه) became Caliph, he did not revoke the decision of Abu Bakr and Umar(رضّى الله عنه) on the propety of Fadak. What stopped Ali (رضّى الله عنه) from doing this? Why don’t the Shiatu dajjal hate Ali (رضّى الله عنه) for failing to return Fadak? Why don’t they hate Ali (رضّى الله عنه) for reaping the gains of Fadak while he was Caliph? Why the double standard with Abu Bakr  and Umar(رضّى الله عنه)? This is also a slap on the face of dajjali donkeys who think that Ali(ra) considered Abubakar and Umar to be liars , had it been so then nothing would have stopped him from revoking the decision of Abubakr(ra) and Umar(ra). Infact Ali(ra) continued the same ruling regarding that property during his caliphate in the same was as it was done in the caliphate of Abubakr and Umar(ra). If supposedly he considered Abubakr and Umar dishonest on this matter like the dajalis claim then why would he follow their footsteps? On the contrary we find in the book of Shia Mutazili Scholar that Ali(ra) said:
إ ن الأمر لما وصل الأمر إلى علي ابن أبي طالب كلّم في رد فدك ، فقال : ” إني لأستحيي من الله أن أرد شيئاً منع منه أبو بكر وأمضاه عمر

When the issue of denying fadak reached Ali(during his caliphate) so he Ali’s reply (ra) was: “I am ashamed before Allah to overturn something that was prohibited by Abu Bakr and (prohibition)continued by Umar.”  {ibn Abil Hadid, Sharh Nahj al-Balaghah, vol. 4 p. 130]

We suggest our readers to even refer this link where the above narration have been explained beautifully: [Refer this link]

Thus the fact is that Ali(ra) never Insulted Abubakr(ra) and Umar(ra), and he is free from being included in the category of most deviated dajjali cult.

 

Not only Ali(ra) has no connection with the dajjali sect but even the Imams from Ahlebayt are free from this dajjali cult.

From the above deceptive arguments which we have shattered by the help of Allah, the shiatu dajjal tried to portray that Ali(ra) has no connection with Ahlesunnah, So now we will prove that the opposite of this is the reality. Ali(ra)  nor Ahlebayt has any connection to the satanic sect of Shiatu dajjal.

1. Imam Ja’afar bin Muhammad al-Sadiq (rah) :

عن عمرو بن قيس الملائي قال : سمعت جعفر بن محمد يقول : برىء الله ممن تبرأ من أبي بكر وعمر . [ حسن ] .

From ‘Amro bin Qays al-Mallaee: I heard Ja’afar bin Muhammad say: “Allah has disassociated himself from those who disassociated themselves from Abu Bakr and ‘Umar.”
Grading: Hasan.

قال الذهبي : قلت: هذا القول متواتر عن جعفر الصادق، أشهد بالله إنه لبار في قوله غير منافق لأحد، فقبح الله الرافضة

Hadith Grading: Imam al Dhahhabi (rah) said while commenting on the narration: This saying is Mutawatir(100% authentic) from Ja’afar al Sadiq, I bear witness in front of Allah that he is honest in his saying and not lying in front of anyone(Taqqiyah), may Allah increase the Rafidah in ugliness.

2. Abdullah ibn Ahmad narrated in his Sunnan(#1303):

حدثني أبي حدثنا محمد بن فضيل حدثنا سالم يعني ابن أبي حفصة قال سألت أبا جعفر وجعفرا عن أبي بكر وعمر رضي الله عنهما فقالا يا سالم تولهما وأبرأ من عدوهما فإنما كانا أمامي هدى وقال لي جعفر يا سالم أبو بكر جدي أيسب الرجل جده قال وقال لي لا نالتني شفاعة محمد  في القيامة إن لم اكن أتولهما وأبرأ من عدوهما

From Salim ibn Abu Hafs: “I asked Abu Jafar and Jafar about Abu Bakr and Umar (may Allah be pleased with them). And they say: “O Salim, befriend to them, and dissolve from their enemies, indeed they were IMAMS OF GUIDANCE” And Jafar said to me: “O Salim, Abu Bakr is my grandfather, does man can abuse his grandfather? And may the intercession of Mohammad not reach me on the day of judgement, if I wouldn’t befriend with them, and wouldn’t dissolve from their enemies”

3. عن سالم بن أبي حفصة قال : سألت أبا جعفر محمد بن علي وجعفر بن محمد عن أبي بكر وعمر عليهما السلام ، فقالا لي : ياسالم تولهما وابرأ من عدوهما فإنهما كانا إمامي هدى . [ حسن ] .

Salim ibn Abi Hafsa that he said: I Asked Abu Ja’afar Muhammad ibn Ali and Ja’afar bin Muhammad about Abu Bakr and ‘Umar peace be upon them and they told me: “Ya Salim, be loyal to them and cut your ties from their enemies as they were two Imams of guidance.“
Grading: Hasan.

4.

عن علي بن هشام عن أبيه قال : سمعت زيد بن علي يقول : البراءة من أبي بكر وعمر ، البراءة من علي رضي الله عنه . [ حسن لغيره ] .

From Ali bin Hisham from his father: I heard Zaid bin Ali say: “If one disassociates himself from Abu Bakr and ‘Umar then he also disassociates himself from ALI may Allah be pleased with him.”

5.

طلبة الرافضة من زيد ابن علي التبرؤ من أبو بكر و عمر فقال: إنهما وزيرا جدي, فقالوا له: إذا نرفضك, فقال لهم: إذهبوا فأنتم الرافضة.”

The Rafidah amongst the Shia told Zaid ibn ‘Ali ibn al-Hussein (rah) during his revolution that he has to abandon the love of Abu Bakr and ‘Umar and he replied: “They are the Companions of my grandfather”, they said to him: “Then we shall refuse you” so he said:”Go! for you are the Rejectionists(al-Rafidah).”

source: “Tu’oun Rafidat al-Yaman fi Sahabat al-Rassul” p17 by Abu Nasr Muhammad ibn ‘Abdullah al-Imam and he said: SAHIH.

6. Not only Imams of Ahlebayt but THE COMPLETE AHLEBAYT are free from the dajjali cult.

عن بسام بن عبدالله الصيرفي قال : سألت أباجعفر قلت : ماتقول في أبي بكر وعمر رضي الله عنهما ، فقال : والله إني لأتولاهما وأستغفر لهما وما أدركنا أحد من أهل بيتي إلا وهو يتولاهما . [ حسن ] .

From Bassam bin Abdullah al-Sayrafi: I asked Abu Ja’afar: What do you say about Abu bakr and ‘Umar may Allah be pleased with them? He replied: “By Allah I am loyal to them and I ask Allah to forgive them and we never met anyone from my family who was not loyal to them.“
Grading: Hasan(good).

 

Correction.

Shiatu dajjal stated:

[Quote] In his al-Sahihah, vol. 1, p. 358, Number 204, this is actually what Shaykh al-Albani records:

” ألا إن من قبلكم من أهل الكتاب افترقوا على ثنتين و سبعين ملة , و إن هذه  الملة ستفترق على ثلاث و سبعين , ثنتان و سبعون في النار , و واحدة في الجنة , و هي الجماعة ” .

Verily, the People of the Book before you split into 72 religions. This Ummah will split into 73 religions. 72 of them will be in the Fire while only one of them will be in Paradise. This saved religion is the Jama’ah.

Compare the above with the submission of al-Hindi al-Nasibi (لعنه الله). Where is the mention of the Sahabah? He has not accurately transmitted the Hadith, and has added his own words in order to save his satanic sect! He had to lie out-rightly upon Shaykh al-Albani for this purpose! Allahu Akbar!

It is the above Hadith that Shaykh al-Albani has authenticated. As for the “I and my Companions” Hadith, Shaykh al-Albani has mentioned it under the above Hadith, and has stated:

أخرجه العقيلي في ” الضعفاء ” ( ص 207 – 208 ) و الطبراني في ” الصغير ” ( 150 ) و قال : ” لم يروه عن يحيى إلا عبد الله بن سفيان ” . و قال العقيلي : ” لا يتابع على حديثه ” .

Al-Aqili recorded in his al-Du’afaa (pp. 207-208) and al-Tabarani recorded in al-Saghir (150) and said: “None narrated it from Yahya except Abdullah ibn Sufyan” and al-Aqili said: “His Hadiths are NOT followed.”

The Hadith is daif (weak) which is why al-Aqili has included it in his al-Du’afaa (The Weak Reports). The Hadiths of its sole narrator, Abdullah ibn Sufyan, are NOT followed.[Quote]

Firstly we admit that we had erred, because we are human beings.(smile).  BUT BUT BUT  we didn’t lie , we just erred in providing the reference, because this narration exists in other book and IT WAS AUTHENTICATED BY Shiekh ALBANI.

Here it is:.. My nation would divide in such and such form, ALL SECTS IN FIRE EXPECT ONE. It was said: Which one Ya Rasulallah? He said: That which I and my Companions are upon.

Sheikh Albani authenticated it in Saheeh at Tirmizi 2641. He said it’s hasan(good). Here is the scan page for that:


And it was reported there from Abdullah ibn Amr ibn al-As. (note: this narration is free of the weak narrator which was pointed by sheikh albani in another version of this narration, which the dajjali quoted)

It was also authenticated by Sheikh ul islam Imam ibn Taymiyyah in Majmu al Fatawa 3/345
Ibn Al-Arabi said it’s Thabit in Ahkamul Quran 3/432 and Baghawi said same in Sharhu Sunna 1/185
In al-Maqasid it is said: It’s hasan sahih, was reported from Abu Hurayra, Sad, ibn Umar, Anas, Jabir and others. See Fawaid al Majmua 1396.

ATTENTION: We would like to bring it to the attention of our esteemed readers that the reason we witnessed such hue and cry from the shiatu dajjal was because of the fear, since they knew that this narration indeed is sufficient to prove the correctness of Ahlesunnah and it is a clear proof that ONLY Ahlesunnah is the saved sect and there is no leg for the dajjalis to claim so, thus we found the desperate attempts of the dajjalis to weaknen this narration. So now unfortunately their fear has become a reality . But we would like to add some chilli powder on the wounds of the dajjalis so that they rest in peace.

Thus here is a gift from us to the dajjalis which is going to be their nightmare. The same narration which have become a nightmare for the dajjalis is also present in SHIA BOOK.

The Prophet (peace be upon him) said “The Ummah will be divided into 73 sects , all of them will go to hell except one”. He was asked “Which sect is that one”. Prophet (peace be upon him) said “That is the one on which I and my companions (ashaab) are”

Shia Book : Maani Al Akhbar, Page 370
Author : Shaikh Sadooq

Click here to see the scan page: [Scan page for the above hadeeth]

 

Deception (7)

Shiatu dajjal stated:

[Quote] First and foremost, a Jama’ah starts from just two people. People who offer Salah regularly know this. Secondly, EVERY Jama’ah ALWAYS has an IMAM! Thirdly, the entire Jama’ah followed the SAME Imam in EVERYTHING they do! Fourthly, the beliefs and practices of the Jama’ah are the same. Where any of the above criteria fails, then there is NO Jama’ah! [Quote]

Instead of entertaining the stupidities of the dajjalis, let us quote before you the definition of Jama’ah from the narrations present in Shia Ahadith.

وبهذا الاسناد، عن أحمد بن أبي عبد الله، عن أبي يحيى الواسطي، عن عبد الله بن يحيى بن عبد الله العلوي رفعه قال: قيل لرسول الله صلى الله عليه واله: ما جماعة امتك ؟ قال: من كان على الحق وإن كانوا عشرة

And by this chain of narration, from Ahmad b. Abi Abdullah, from abi Yahyal al Wasiti, from Abdullah b. Yahya b. Abdullah al Alawi who lifted it (i.e. narrated in ma’rfoo manner) said: It was said to Rasool allah (pbuh): “What is jama’ah of your (pbuh) ummah?” [Rasool Allah (pbuh)] said: “Those who are upon the truth although they may be ten (in numbers).”  [Ma'ani al akhbaar, Section on the meaning of al jama'ah (group/community), al firqah (sect) and the sunnah and the bidah]

Similar is reported from Al-Khatib al-Bagdadi who narrates from Ibn Mas’ud (may Allah be pleased with him) that he said:  “The jama’ah is the the Quran and the Sunnah even if you are all alone.” In another narration: “The jama’ah refers to those who hold on to the truth even if you are all alone.”[Al-Khatib al-Bagdadi: al-Faqih wa al-Mutafaqqih, vol. 2, p. 191][ Source]

So we find that the only definition from narration regarding Jama’ah is that the ones who are on truth are Jama’ah and  that Quran and Sunnah is Jama’ah. So let us see that does this criteria fits to shiatu dajjal?

Ibn Hajar al-Haythamee also metioned in his Majma’ az-Zawaa’id (2/10) with a good chain of narration that ‘Aasim bin Bahdalah said:

قلت للحسن بن علي : الشيعة يزعمون أن عليًا يرجع ؟ قال : كذب أولئك

الكذابون، لو علمنا ذلك ما تزوج نساؤه، ولا قسمنا ميراثه

“I said to ‘al-Hasan bin ‘Alee: “The Shee’ah claim that ‘Alee will return.”He said: “Those LIARS have lied. For if we had known that, his women would not have married and we would not have divided his inheritance.”

Comment: We know that Shi’ites hold the belief of raj’ah which is that their Imams will return, now Hasan(ra) called people who hold such belief as LIARS. So can they be people of Truth? No way.

Moreover how can the people who believe in lying and deceiving their opponents be considered people of truth? Its ridiculous even if someone has such misconception.

Shia infallible Imam in shia hadeeth states(by Allah Imams of ahlebayt are free from the filth that is attributed to them by dajjalis):

إذا رأيتم أهل البدع والريب – غير الشيعي أو الشيعي المهتدي – فأظهروا البراءة منهم وأكثروا من سبهم والقول فيهم والوقيعة ، وباهتوهم – اي ابهتوهم بالكذب والبهتان – كي لا يطمعوا في الفساد في الإسلام ويحذرهم الناس )[ تنبيه الخواطر ج 2 ص 162] .
[ وسائل الشيعة ج 11 ص 508] .
[ نهج الإنتصار ص 152] .

Imam Al-sajjad (as) said: If you see people of suspicion and innovation – other than shias or new shia – then show disownment from them and abuse them much, backbit them, make false accusations on them – that is, backbite them by attributing lies on them and make false accusations on them (‘Buhtaan’) …
[tanbiah al-khawatir v.2 p.162 – wasael al-shia v.11 p. 508 – Nahj al-intisaar p.152]

Intrestingly Giant shia scholars give fatawas(verdicts) based on these narrations for example Grand Ayatullah Al Khoei’i

سؤال 1245: هل يجوز الكذب على المبدع أو مروج الضلال في مقام الاحتجاج عليه إذا كان الكذب يدحض حجته ويبطل دعاويه الباطلة؟ الخوئي: إذا توقف رد باطله عليه جاز.

Question”1245″: Is it Possible to Lie or produce Arguments which contain Lies when Debating with a person who Is a Follower of Bida’a (Innovation/ they probably mean Sunnis) and a spreader or Dala’la (Ignorance/ us as well) If this Lie would Destroy my Opponent’s Arguments?

Imam Khoei’i Answers: If it will stop his Falsehood then it is Permissible to do So. (Imam Khoei’i, Sirat el Najat, Volume 1, Page 447) (online source)

A similar fatwa was issue by Grand ayatullah sistani:

السؤال: هل يعاقب الله الشخص اذا اجبر على الكذب في مواضع محرجة اذا سئل عنها خاصة اذا كان المقابل يسال كثيرا عن اشياء لاتخصه ؟

الجواب: لايجوز الكذب الا اذا كان لدفع ضرر.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The other version which clarifies who the jama’ah is:

The word “Jama’ah” means “the party” or “the group”.Here it should be understood which “Jama’ah” is the phrase talking to us about? Is it of a particular Jama’ah at a particular time or of any Jama’ah at any time. To know this we should know how did this name come to it’s phrase and from which text of the Qur’aan and Sunnah did it come as an evidence of this phrase.

This word is taken from the famous authentic hadeeth reported by: Imam At-Tirmidhi in his Sunan, Imam Abu Dawud in his Sunan, Imam An-Nasie in his Sunan, Imam Al-lalakie in his Sharh Usool I’tiqaad Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah minal Kiaabi was Sunnathi wa Ijma’a As-Sahaba wa At-Tabeen waman ba’dahum and other scholars of Hadith in their different Hadith references on the authority of Abdullah bin Amr as the Prophet Muhammed(saw) saying : “That which came to Bani Israel will verily as well come to my nation as similar to the footstep even if that if there was in them (the Bani Israel) who commit with his mother adultery in public as well it would be found in my nation similar to that And verily the Bani Israel divided into seventy two sects and my nation would divide into seventy three sects all are to hell except one” on that the Companions of the Prophet Muhammed r asked : “Who that one is Oh! Rasullullah”

The Prophet Muhammed(saw) replied :”Al-Jama’ah” and in another narration as “Ma Ana Alaihe wa Ashabi” which means as “ That which I and my Companions are upon ” (we have proved the authenticity of this version above).

Comment: So we find that the word which explains Jam’ah through substitution is “That which I and my Companions are upon”. Thus we understand that the word “Al-Jama’ah” stands for the companions of the Prophet Muhammed(Saw) and not any one else. If this matter was taken even just rationally without any narration, then still it tells us that it could be only the companions of the Prophet Muhammed(saw) as the particular party being addressed by the Prophet Muhammed(Saw) cannot be other than them as there was no Muslms at that time other than the Prophet Muhammed(saw) and his companions. From this the clear meaning of the word of “Al-Jama’ah” comes to us. Thus the meaning of the whole phrase “Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah” means in the normal Arabic language as those who are strickly following the Sunnah as that of the method applied by the Prophet Muhammad(Saw) and his Companions were at that time.

The term Ahlesunnah wal Jama’ah exists from the time of Sahaba(ra) as to denote the Saved sect.

 This term was known even during the time of the Sahabah and the proof is the Tafsir of the following Ayah:

{يَوْمَ تَبْيَضُّ وُجُوهٌ وَتَسْوَدُّ وُجُوهٌ فَأَمَّا الَّذِينَ اسْوَدَّتْ وُجُوهُهُمْ أَكْفَرْتُم بَعْدَ إِيمَانِكُمْ فَذُوقُواْ الْعَذَابَ بِمَا كُنْتُمْ تَكْفُرُونَ}
{“…on the day when some faces will be brightened, and some faces will be blackened…”} [Al 'Imran; 106]

The major Mufassir of the Sunnah, the Sahabi of Ahl Al-Bayt, Ibn Abbas (RA) said regarding this Ayah:

تبيض وجوه أهل السنة والجماعة وتسود وجوه أهل البدع والضلالة
“Those whose faces will be brightened are Ahl as-Sunnah wal-Jama’ah. As for those whose faces will be blackened, then they are the people of innovation and misguidance (ahl al-bida’ wad-dalalah).”

[This Athar/report is Sahihan/authentically reported by Ibn Abbas, the scholar of Ahl Al-Bayt in Al-Lalika'i's 'Sharh Usul I'tiqad Ahl as-Sunnah' (1/72), also by Ibn Ai Hatim in his Tafsir 3/124 and with similar wordings by Ibn Kathir. Thus the truthful scholars of the Sunnah have always used to term to distinguish the Ahl Al-Haqq (people of truth) with the Ahl Al-Batil (People of falsehood)]

Then the shiatu dajjal stated:

[Quote] The next question to ask is: are Sunnis a Jama’ah? Do Sunnis follow the same sole Imam? Do they even have any Imam? Do Sunnis share the same beliefs?[Quote]

Let us answer the questions of the dajjalis frist before throwing the same questions towards them.

Indeed Ahlesunnah are the only Jama’ah as we showed above. Yes if Imam in the sense of infallible divinely appointed Imam. Then yes Ahlesunnah follows One Imam and that is Prophet Muhammad(Saw). Ahlesunnah means those who follow the sunnah of Prophet(Saw) and they are on the way of Prophet(Saw) and his companions, so anyone who deviates from this cannot be labeled as Ahlesunnah.

Now let us ask the same questions to Dajjalis:

1.Who is the same and sole Imam Shias follow? Please prove that how are you following that Imam? And after you respond these questions, then if we prove that in the same way you are following some other Imams then will you agree that you don’t follow sole Imam but multiple Imams and are void of being called as Jama’ah?

2. Do Ithna Ashari(twelver) shias share the same beliefs? Please keep in mind Akhbaris shias and Usoolis shias before daring to give a deceptive answer. Here are those differences between shias who follow the same twelve Imams. Differences between Akhbaris and Usoolis.

If this is not sufficient then let us quote the great scholar of shiism :

Esteemed Shia scholar Sheikh Tusi in his book “Uddat al-Usul” (1/354) said:

فاني وجدتها مختلفة المذاهب في الاحكام، يفتي أحدهم بما لا يفتي به صاحبه في جميع أبواب الفقه من الطهارة إلى أبواب الديات من العبادات

“I have found different ways (schools) in the legal rulings (ahkam). One of them issues a fatwa, which his contemporary does not. These differences exist in all chapters of jurisprudence from those concerning the laws on ritual purity (al-tahara) to the chapter on indemnity (al-diyat) and on the questions of worship…..”

Thus we find that according to the foolish rule invented by dajjalis, the shias are not included in the definition of Jama’ah.

 

Deception (8)

Shiatu dajjal stated:

[Quote] The Hadith stating that the Shi’a of Imam Ali (عليه السّلام) in particular and the Ahl al-Bayt (عليهم السلام) in general are the saved Jama’ah is also mutawatir in meaning. So, there is absolutely no doubt about its authenticity. To save space, we will be citing the various reports of the various Sahabah from the Sunni sources.

Imam al-Suyuti states in his al-Durr al-Manthur (Beirut: Dar al-Fikr; 1993) vol. 8, p. 589:

وأخرج ابن عساكر عن جابر بن عبد الله قال كنا عند النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم فأقبل علي فقال النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم : ” والذي نفسي بيده إن هذا وشيعته لهم الفائزون يوم القيامة ونزلت إن الذين آمنوا وعملوا الصالحات أولئك هم خير البرية ” فكان أصحاب النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم إذا أقبل علي قالوا : جاء خير البريةوأخرج ابن عدي وابن عساكر عن أبي سعيد مرفوعا : علي خير البرية وأخرج ابن عدي عن ابن عباس قال : لما نزلت إن الذين آمنوا وعملوا الصالحات أولئك هم خير البرية قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم لعلي : هو أنت وشيعتك يوم القيامة راضين مرضيين “وأخرج ابن مردويه عن علي قال : قال لي رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم : ” ألم تسمع قول الله : إن الذين آمنوا وعملوا الصالحات أولئك هم خير البرية أنت وشيعتك وموعدي وموعدكم الحوض إذا جئت الأمم للحساب تدعون غرا محجلين

[Quote]

The narration which the shiatu dajjal posted are fabrications as declared by Scholars of Ahlesunnah, because the chains of those narrations contains LIARS, FABRICATORS, RAFIDI(dajjalis) narrators.

As Imam Suyuti(the same scholar quoted by religious deceivers) in “Leal al masnua” 1/345 wrote:
(الخطيب) حدثني الحسن بن أبي طالب حدثنا أحمد بن إبراهيم حدثنا صالح بن أحمد بن يونس الهمداني حدثنا عصام بن الحكم العكبري حدثنا جميع بن عمر البصري
حدثنا سوار عن محمد بن جحادة عن الشعبي عن علي قال قال لي رسول الله أنت وشيعتك في الجنة
موضوع سوار ليس بثقة وجميع كذاب يضع
“(Khateeb) From Hasan ibn Abu Talib, from Muhammad ibn Ibrahim, Salih ibn Ahmad ibn Yunus Hamadani, Asim ibn Hakim Akbari, Jami ibn Umar Basri, Surr, Muhamamd ibn Juhada, Shabi from Ali : “Prophet said to me: “You and your shia gonna be in heaven”.(Narration) fabricated. Surr isn’t truthful, and Jami is liar, (which use) to fabricate”.

Readers can go through the analysis of rest of these fabricated narrations here: Analysis of Fabricated narrations that shias will enter heaven

But the religious deceivers didn’t stop there, they misquoted a rule of hadeeth science inorder to deceive lay people, Shiatu dajjal stated:

[Quote] The presence of a high number of chains for this Hadith is sufficient evidence of its authenticity. Shaykh al-Albani states in his Silsilah al-Ahadith al-Sahihah, vol. 4, p. 360, Number 1761 while criticizing a Sunni scholar who weakened Hadith al-Thaqalayn:

أنه لم يلتفت إلى أقوال المصححين للحديث من العلماء و لا إلى قاعدتهم التي ذكروها في ” مصطلح الحديث ” : أن الحديث الضعيف يتقوى بكثرة الطرق

He did not pay attention to the statements of those who have authenticated the Hadith from among the scholars, nor did he pay attention to their principle which has been mentioned in Mustalah al-Hadith: “A weak Hadith becomes strong through the profusion of chains.”

Therefore, even if all the chains of the above Hadith are weak, it is still strong due to its immensely numerous chains. [Quote]

Let us expose the followers of dajjal again, because the religious deceivers following the teaching of their cult tried to deceive people by half-quoting the rule. Here is the complete rule and just see how the it destroys baseless claims of shiatu dajjal.

{“According to the definitions of al-Tirmidhi and Ibn al-Salah, a number of similar weak ahadith on a particular issue can be raised to the degree of Hasan if the weakness found in their reporters is of a mild nature. Such a hadith is known as Hasan li ghairihi (Hasan due to others), to distinguish it from the type previously-discussed, which is Hasan li dhatihi (Hasan in itself). Similarly, several Hasan ahadith on the same subject may make the hadith Sahih li ghairihi, to be distinguished from the previously-discussed Sahih li dhatihi.

However, in case the WEAKNESS IS SEVERE (e.g., the reporter is accused of LYING or the hadith is itself Shadhdh), such VERY WEAK ahadith will not support each other and will remain WEAK. For example, the well-known hadith, “He who preserves forty ahadith for my Ummah will be raised by Allah on the Day of Resurrection among the men of understanding”, has been declared to be Da`if by most of the traditionists, although it is reported through several routes. [al-Jaza'iri, p. 149]“} [/source]

Comment: So we find that the rule which the dajjalis were trying to use inorder to save those fabrications cannot be applied here, since those narrations contains extreme weakness.

The religious deceivers knew very well that there deception is going to be destroyed very easily, So they tried another trick which they had used for another fabricated narration that have been exposed in Part 3. Let us quote from there since it is sufficient to destroy this deception of religious deceivers.

The shia of dajjal knew it very well that all those narrations they are quoting are fabricated and rejected narrations. They are fabrications of narrators who were rafidah, liars and rejected ones. So inorder to some how defend those fabrications the dajjalis played a trick, they tried to label these narrations as mutawattir[THOUGH NONE OF THE SCHOLARS FROM AHLESUNNAH CLAIMED SO] and the religious deceivers did so because when a narration reaches a level of mutawattir then it doesn’t gets affected by the weakness of narrators present in the chains. But before exposing the deception of religious deceivers let us show you the flaws in the understandings of shiatu dajjal. The dajjali said: [ In fact, the standard rule is that the chains of a mutawatir Hadith are NOT to be examined AT ALL, no matter what one suspects about them. They are to be acted upon without ANY examination of their chain]

So we find that Mutawattir, according to dajjli understanding only involves the number, so the source doesn’t  matter, even if it was a Christian source, then one should accept it… according to dajjali definition, for example: Is it possible for 10 liars to gather up in a room and fabricate a hadith?  The obvious answer which any person who has some knowledge would say, Yes.  Now, can each of the ten liars come up with a fake chain?

The answer would be yes its possible. Well, there you go. Hadith sciences is all about logic this is why the definition of mutawatir doesn’t simply revolve on the numbers. If the shiatu dajjal would like to behave like bigots as they often do, then here is a gift for them. Hadeeth tafdeel which is a mutawattir narration: [Refer this link to see its chains] this narrations shows that Abubakar and Umar were considered as the most virtues people after Prophet[saw], So we hope that the foolish understandings of hadeeth science which the dajjalis possess should force them to accept these narrations and to act upon them. If they argue that the sources we provided were sunni sources then, they should remember that narrations they provided were mostly from rafidi[dajjali] narrators, moreover according to their understanding what only matters is the NUMBER and the source doesn’t matter. Even if it was a Christian source, then they should accept it, due to their foolish understandings. And we have many other examples which will help the shiatu dajjal to realize their stupidity.

Now lets us shatter the trick of shiatu dajjal, in which the dajjal tried to justify that people shouldn’t check the narrators of mutawattir narration. But before that let us clear before you that the rule which the dajjalis quoted is not applicable to narrators that were liars or had serious criticism towards them, in the sense that the condition means that if chains contain narrators with general weakeness then its not a problem amd they could be termed as mutawattir and the weakness of narrators doesn’t harm the narration, but if chains contain liars then or rejected narrators then that narration in the first instance couldn’t even be termed as mutawattir.

Now let us clear before an important condition which is vital in making a narration mutawatir.

Shiekh Abdullah al-sa’ad in his commntary, when speaking about a hadith in sunan Al-Tirmithee provides the conditions for a hadeeth to be mutawattir.

So the Conditions that must occur to make a hadith mutawatir are:

والشرط الثالث: أن يستحيل في العادة تواطئهم على الكذب؛ ومعنى هذا الشرط أن يكونوا من الثقات؛ لأن الكذابين قد يتفق منهم جماعة، عشرين أو ثلاثين أو أربعين على الكذب، أما جماعة من الثقات لا يمكن أن يتفقوا على الكذب،

“The third condition: It is impossible for them to agree upon narrating a lie, and this means that they need to be trustworthy, because liars can agree to lie, sometimes twenty or thirty or fourty. But trustworthy narrators cannot agree on telling a lie.” (source)

Now if we see that the narrations which the dajjlis provided they never passed this criteria,  because  most of the chains have rafidi narrators or those chains had liars and rejected narrators among them.

Imaam ash-Shaafi’ee and other Ulemaa stated that we should not narrate from the Raafidhah Shee’ah as they are amongst the liars. Ibn Taymiyyah reported in his Minhaaj as-Sunnah (1/59 -62):

وقال مؤمل بن إهاب سمعت يزيد بن هارون يقول يكتب عن كل صاحب بدعة

إذا لم يكن داعية إلا الرافضة فإﻧﻬم يكذبون

Mu’mal Ibn Ihaab said: I heard Yazeed Bin Haaroon (d. 206H) saying,The narrations of every person of innovation can be written as long as he is not a caller to it, except the Raafidah, since they are liars.

Minhaaj as-Sunnah (1/69):

قال أبو حاتم الرازي سمعت يونس بن عبد الأعلى يقول قال أشهب بن عبد العزيز

سئل مالك عن الرافضة فقال لا تكلمهم ولا ترو عنهم فإﻧﻬم يكذبون وقال أبو

حاتم حدثنا حرملة قال سمعت الشافعي يقول لم أر أحدا أشهد بالزور من الرافضة

“Aboo Haatim ar-Raazee (d.277H) said,I heard Yoonus bin ‘Abd al-A’laa saying: Ashhaab bin ‘Abdul’Azeez asked Maalik (d.179H) about the Raafidah, so he said, “Do not speak to them and do not narrate from them, since they lie.

And Aboo Haatim said, “Harmalah related to us saying: I heard ash-Shaafi’ee (d.204H) saying,“I have not seen anyone testifying for more evil than the Raafidah.”

[Note: The dajjalis might again try to use a deceptive tricks by saying that Rafidi narrators are present in sahihein, so why are we rejecting there narrations? The answer to this argument is that a narrator being present in Isnad of narration present in sahihein doesn’t makes that narrator trustworthy, its misconception spread by dajjalis due to their ignorancy. Infact those narrations which have rafidi narrator present in sahihein are maqroon, meaning that those narrations have another solid chain which is free of rafidi narrators. Moreover according to the standard rule of hadeeth science the narrations of innovators aren’t to be accepted when thos narrations support the heresy(beliefs) of those innovators.]

So we find that the narrations religious deceivers presented and the rule of mutawattir narrations they tried to use in order to defend those fabrications, was just an intellectual fraud. Neither the narration they brought could be labeled as mutawattir nor does it even have a single authentic chain available for it, because all of the chains have severe problems in them, since these narrations were nothing but fabrications of shiatu dajjal.

 

 

THE CLASSICAL EXAMPLE OF DECEPTION:

Here we are going to present a classic example of deception and halfquotations by shiatu dajjal, which further affirms our stand on calling them religious deceivers, because after seeing this proof none of our unbiased readers will have any objection towards us, in calling shiatudajjal as religious deceivers. Shiatu dajjal stated:

[Quote] Ibn Hajar al-Haytami states in his al-Sawaiq al-Muhriqah, vol. 2, p. 468:

وأخرج الدارقطني يا أبا الحسن أما أنت وشيعتك في الجنة …قال الدارقطني لهذا الحديث عندنا طرقات كثيرة ثم أخرج عن أم سلمة رضي الله عنها قالت كانت ليلتي وكان النبي عندي فأتته فاطمة فتبعها علي رضي الله عنهما فقال النبي يا علي أنت وأصحابك في الجنة أنت وشيعتك في الجنة

Al-Darqutni recorded that the Prophet said: “O father of al-Hasan (i.e. Imam Ali), as for you AND YOUR SHI’A, YOU WILL BE IN PARADISE…

Al-Darqutni said: “This Hadith, with us, has IMMENSELY NUMEROUS CHAINS.”

Then he recorded that Umm Salamah, may Allah be pleased with her, narrated:

One night, while the Prophet was with me, Fatima came to him, and Ali, may Allah be pleased with them both, followed her. Then the Prophet said, “O Ali. YOU AND YOUR COMPANIONS WILL BE IN PARADISE. YOU AND YOUR SHI’A WILL BE IN PARADISE.” [Quote]

The religious deceivers deceptively omitted some crucial part of the reports they were quoting , because had they quoted the complete part , then the narration would have turned against them.

Here is the complete extract:
وأخرج الدارقطني يا أبا الحسن أما أنت وشيعتك في الجنة وإن قوما يزعمون أنهم يحبونك يصغرون الإسلام ثم يلفظونه يمرقون منه كما يمرق السهم من الرمية لهم نبز يقال لهم الرافضة فإن أدركتهم فقاتلهم فإنهم مشركون

قال الدارقطني لهذا الحديث عندنا طرقات كثيرة ثم أخرج عن أم سلمة رضي الله عنها قالت كانت ليلتي وكان النبي عندي فأتته فاطمة فتبعها علي رضي الله عنهما فقال النبي يا علي أنت وأصحابك في الجنة أنت وشيعتك في الجنة
إلا أنه ممن يزعم ممن يحبك
أقوام يصغرون الإسلام يلفظونه يقرأون القرآن لا يجاوز تراقيهم لهم نبز يقال لهم الرافضة فجاهدهم فإنهم مشركون قالوا يا رسول الله ما العلامة فيهم قال لا

(source)

Al-Daaraqutni recorded that the Prophet said: “O father of al-Hasan (Aba Al-Hassan i.e. Ali Ibn Abi Talib), as for you and your shiah, you will be in paradise, (now begins the part omitted by Shiatu dajjal) although a people will CLAIM TO LOVE YOU, they will belittle Islam then leave it, they will leave it as arrow leaving bow. They have bad name, they are called the Al-RAFIDAH(Rejectionists). If you would reach them fight them because they are polytheists (Mushriks).

Al-Daaraqutni said: “This Hadith, with us, has immensely numerous chains.

Then he recorded that Umm Salamah(ra) narrated: It was my night and while the Prophet was with me, Fatimah came to him, and Ali, may Allah be pleased with them both, followed her. Then the Prophet said, “o Ali. You and your companions will be in paradise, you and your shia will be in paradise” [end quote]

Note: Though according to hadeeth science standards the above narrations are also weak but there are many other different versions of these narrations, which doesn’t have the part “Shia will be in paradise” but those narrations mentions about the rafidah(shiatu dajjal).

Who are Raafidah and What is the Difference between Shiah and Rafidah?

There is difference of chalk and cheese between RAFIDAH and SHIAH, because the rafidah are not general Shias, they are Shia of Dajjal. Here is the Difference between ‘Shia’ & ‘Rafidi’

‘Allamah Sarfaraz Khan Safdar (may Allah have mercy on him) writes in Irshad al-Shia that one of the main reason for some scholars hesitation in takfir of Shi’as in due to the fact that ‘Shia’ and ‘Rafidi had different connotation over the centuries. The word ‘Shia’ had different meaning according to Mutaqaddimin while Muta’akhirin used it in different sense. Let alone laymen, many scholars are not even aware of this difference and this can lead them to confusion when they come across different rulings regarding Shi’as.

Hafiz ibn Hajar (may Allah have mercy on him) writes,
تهذيب التهذيب 1:56 ابن حجر
فالتشيع في عرف المتقدمين هو اعتقاد تفضيل علي على عثمان وأن عليا كان مصيبا في حروبه وأن مخالفه مخطئ مع تقديم الشيخين وتفضيلهماالى قوله وأما التشيع في عرف المتأخرين فهو الرفض المحض فلا تقبل رواية الرافضي الغالي ولا كرامة

“So, tashayyu’ according to the earlier scholars (Mutaqaddimin) is to believe that Sayyiduna Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) is superior to Sayyiduna Usman (may Allah be pleased with him) and that Sayyiduna Ali was rightful in his wars while his opponents were on wrong, whereas they regard Shaykhayn (Sayyiduna Abu Bakr and Sayyiduna Umar, may Allah be pleased with them) superordinate and superior … but according to the latter scholars,tashayyu’ is pure rifd, so the tradition of extremist Rafidi will not be accepted and he will not be given any regard.” (Tahzib al-Tahzib, 1:56)

And Imam Jalal al-Din Suyuti (may Allah have mercy on him) writes,

تدريب الراوى 1:253 جلال الدين السيوطي
وقد صرح بذلك الذهبي في « الميزان » ، فقال : البدعة على ضربين صغرى كالتشيع بلا غلو ، أو بغلو ، كمن تكلم في حق من حارب علياً ، فهذا كثير في التابعين وتابعيهم مع الدين والورع والصدق ، فلو رد حديث هؤلاء لذهب جملة من الآثار النبوية ، وهذه مفسدة بينة ، ثم بدعة كبرى كالرفض الكامل والغلو فيه ، والحط على أبي بكر وعمر والدعاء إلى ذلك ، فهذا النوع لا يحتج بهم ولا كرامة

“Al-Dhahabi (may Allah have mercy on him) has written this in al-Mizan and said: bid’ah is of two types; smaller like tashayyu’ without extremism, or with extremism, like one who criticized those who fought Sayyiduna Ali. There were many such people in the tabi’in and their followers along with religiousness, piety and truthfulness. If their traditions are rejected, a good part of the Prophet’s (Allah bless him and give him peace) heritage will vanish, and this will be an open evil. The second one is greater bid’ah like complete rifd and resorting to extremism in this regard, to debase Sayyiduna Abu Bakr and Sayyiduna Umar and inviting to the same. So, these kinds of people will not be accepted and given any esteem.” (Tadrib al-Rawi, 1:253)

Shaykh Sarfaraz mentions from this we know that ‘SHIAS’ during the time of Salaf AGREED WITH AHL AL SUNNAH WAL JAMA”AH ON ALL MATTERS OF USUL AND FURU apart from giving preference to Sayyiduna Ali over Sayyiduna Usman but even this is bid’ah as it is against ijma of the Ummah. These people respected the Shaykhayn and they didn’t make takfir of Sayyiduna Muawiyyah (may Allah be pleased with him).

So shias during the time of Salaf didn’t have different beliefs than AhleSunnah. So the rafidah aren’t Shias.

So now let us wake the day dreaming Shiatu dajjal, by quoting them the narrations in regards to Rafidah(shiatu dajjal), the sect to which they actually belong.

Here are Sunni narrations regarding Rafeedah:

نظر النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم إلى علي فقال هذا في الجنة وإن من شيعته قوماً يلغون الإسلام يرفضونه لهم نبز يسمون الرافضة من لقيهم فليقتلهم فإنهم مشركون
الراوي: فاطمة بنت رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم المحدث: الشوكاني – المصدر: در السحابة – الصفحة أو الرقم: 36
خلاصة حكم المحدث: إسناده رجاله ثقات
Fatima bint Rassul Allah PBUT said: The Prophet PBUH looked at Ali and said: “He is in paradise and in his Shia are folks who will cancel Islam and reject it, they will be known as the rejectors(Rafidha), he who sees them must fight them for they are polytheists(Moushrikoun).”

source: Imam al Shawkani said the narrators are trustworthy in Durr al Sahabah 36, He also narrated it from Ibn Abbas (ra) and said Isnad Hasan

“I was with the Prophet and Sayyiduna Ali was also present there and the Prophet said, ‘O Ali, soon a nation will appear who will claim the love of Ahl al-Bayt and they will be known as Rawafid, do qital against them as they will be mushriks.” (Narrated by Tabarani and Majma al-Zawaid, 1:22 with a sound chain)
31638 – عن علي قال : يخرج في آخر الزمان قوم لهم نبز يقال لهم الرافضة يعرفون به ينتحلون شيعتنا وليسوا من شيعتنا وآية ذلك أنهم يشتمون أبا بكر وعمر أينما أدركتموهم فاقتلوهم فإنهم مشركون ( اللالكائي )

Sayyiduna Ali (may God be pleased with him) narrates from the Prophet (God bless him and give him peace),
قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلمظهر في آخر الزمان قوم يسمون الرافضة يرفضون الإسلام
“In later times a nation will appear [with all its pomp] known as Rawafid and they will leave ['usul and furu] of Islam.” (Musnad Ahmad, 1:103)
Sayyiduna ‘Abd Allah ibn Abbas (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates,
كنت مع النبي صلى الله عليه و سلم وعنده علي فقال النبي صلى الله عليه و سلم : يا علي سيكون في أمتي قوم ينتحلون حب أهل البيت لهم نبز يسمون الرافضة قاتلوهم فإنهم مشركون -
رواه الطبراني وإسناده حسن
“Sayyiduna Ali narrated that a nation will emerge and they will be known as Rawafid; they will claim to be from our group, but in reality they will not be from us; their sign will be that they will abuse Sayyiduna Abu Bakr and Umar…” (Kanz al-Amal, 11:440)

There are similar narrations narrated in Musnad Abu Yala, Bazzar, Tabarani, Majma al-Zawaid , Kazn al-Amal , and Sawaiq al-Muhriqah, from various Sahabah such as Sayyidah Fatimah bint Muhammad and Umm Salmah (may Allah be pleased with them).

Here that narration with chain from “Mojam al-Kabeer”:
لمعجم الكبير ج: 12 ص: 242
12998 حدثنا أبو يزيد القراطيسي وعمرو بن بن السرج قالا ثنا يوسف بن عدي ثنا الحجاج بن تميم عن ميمون بن مهران عن بن عباس قال كنت ثم النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم وعنده علي فقال النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم ثم يا علي سيكون في أمتي قوم ينتحلون حبنا أهل البيت لهم نبز يسمون الرافضة فاقتلوهم فإنهم مشركون
المعجم الكبير ج: 12 ص: 242
12997 حدثنا علي بن عبد العزيز ثنا أحمد بن يونس ثنا عمران بن زيد ثنا الحجاج بن تميم عن ميمون بن مهران عن عبد الله بن عباس عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم قال ثم يكون قوم في آخر الزمان يسمون الرافضة يرفضون الإسلام ويلفظونه فاقتلوهم فإنهم مشركون

In the narration below their sign is that they will criticize the early Muslims (Sahabah).
وعن أم سلمة قالت : كانت ليلتي وكان النبي صلى الله عليه و سلم عندي فأتته فاطمة فسبقها علي فقال له النبي صلى الله عليه و سلم : ” يا علي أنت وأصحابك في الجنة إلا أنه ممن يزعم أنه يحبك أقوام يرفضون الإسلام ثم يلفظونه يقرؤون القرآن لا يجاوز تراقيهم لهم نبز يقال لهم : الرافضة فإن أدركتهم فجاهدهم فإنهم مشركون ” . قلت : يا رسول الله ما العلامة فيهم ؟ قال : ” لا يشهدون جمعة ولا جماعة ويطعنون على السلف الأول “
: كنز العمال في سنن الأقوال والأفعال المؤلف : علي بن حسام الدين المتقي الهندي (11/440)

Umm Salamah said: It was my night with the Prophet (pbuh) and the Prophet (pbuh) was with me so Fatimah came to visit and Ali arrived first so the Prophet (pbuh) said to him: O Ali, you and your friends are in Paradise except that there are those who claim they love you, groups who refuse Islam yet pronounce it, they read the Qur’an yet it doesn’t go past their throats, they have a nickname, they are called “the Refusers”. If you happen to meet them, struggle against them, for they are idolaters. Ali said: O Prophet of God, what is their sign? He (Pbuh) said: They don’t attend Friday prayers, and leave the congregation of the Muslims, and they speak badly about the first generation of Muslims. [Kanzul Amal Fee Sunan Al Aqwal wal Af'aal, Author: Ali bin Hussam al Deen al Mutaqi al Hindi, page 440, volume 11]

- عن علي قال : قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه و سلم : يا علي ألا أدلك على عمل إذا فعلته كنت من أهل الجنة – وإنك من أهل الجنة – ؟ إنه سيكون بعدي أقوام يقال لهم الرافضة فإن أدركتهم فاقتلهم فإنهم مشركون قال علي : سيكون بعدنا أقوام ينتحلون مودتنا يكونون علينا مارقة وآية ذلك أنهم يسبون أبا بكر وعمر ( خيثمة بن سليمان الأطرابلسي في فضائل الصحابة اللالكائي في السنة )

Ali narrated: The Prophet (pbuh) said: O Ali, Shall I not tell you about an act which will lead you to Paradise, and you are going to Paradise? There will come after me groups who will be called “refusers” so if you meet them then kill them because they are idolaters. Ali said: There will come after us groups who claim to love us but they are actually rebelling against us, their sign is that they insult Abu Bakr and Umar.

Khaythama bin Sulayman Al Atrabilsi in Fada’il al Sahaba Al la’alka’ee fee al Sunnah

وعن ابن عباس عن النبي صلى الله عليه و سلم قال يكون في آخر الزمان قوم ينبزون الرافضة يرفضون الإسلام ويلفظونه قاتلوهم فإنهم مشركون رواه أبو يعلى والبزار والطبراني ورجاله وثقوا وفي بعضهم خلاف

Ibn Abass said the Prophet (pbuh) said: There will come at the end of time a people who will be called “the refusers”, they refuse Islam though they pronounce it, fight them for they are idolaters.

Narrated by Abu Ya’lee and Albazaar and Al Tabaraanee and his narrators are reliable and in some of them there is a difference of opinion

(وأخرج) الذهبي عن ابن عباس مرفوعا (يكون في آخر الزمان قوم يسمون الرافضة يرفضون الإسلام فاقتلوهم فإﻧﻬم مشركون).

Al Zahabi records that Ibn Abbass said in a marfoo’ quote: There will be at the end of time a people called “the refusers(rafidah)” they refuse Islam, so fight them for their are idolaters.

-وعن علي بن أبي طالب قال : قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه و سلم : يظهر في آخر الزمان قوم يسمون الرافضة يرفضون الإسلام

Ali bin Abi Taleb said: the Prophet (pbuh) said: At the end of time there will appear a group called “the refusers” they will refuse Islam

قال اجتمع عند علي رضي الله عنه جاثليتو النصارى و رأس الجالوت كبير علماء اليهود فقال الرأس: تجادلون على كم افترقت اليهود؟ قال: على إحدى و سبعين فرقة.
فقال علي عليه السلام “لتفترقن هذه الأمة على مثل ذلك، و أضلها فرقة و شرها: الداعية إلينا! أهل البيت آية ذلك أنهم يشتمون أبا بكر و عمر رضي الله عنهما

Al Ibanah tul Kubra chapter “(1\1229 #254)

“Ibn Battah reported in his al-Ibaanah al Kubraa, in the chapter: Mentioning the sections of the Nations in their religion and upon how many sects will the Ummah split into, from the Hadeeth of Abee ‘Alee bin Ismaa’eel bin al-Abbaas al-Warraaq who said: al-Hassan bin Muhammad bin as-Sabaah az-Za’faraanee narrated to me that Shabbaabah said, that Sawaadah bin Salamah said that ‘Abdullaah bin Qays(ra) said: “A group of Christians came to ‘Alee (ra) and at the head of them was a major scholar of the Jews. So the leader said: “You debate about how many groups the Jews split into?” He said: “Into seventy one sects”. And Alee(ra) said: “And this Ummah will split into similar to that, and the most deviated and evil sect of them: the ones who call to us (Ahlul Bayt), and a sign of them is that they insult Aboo Bakr(ra) and ‘Umar(ra)”

Info of narrators:

و أبو علي بن العباس الوراق روى عنه الدارقطني و وثقه و قال الذهبي عنه: المحدث
الإمام الحجة، و ذكره يوسف بن عمر القواس في جملة شيوخه الثقات
“And as for Aboo ‘Alee bin al-’Abbaas al-Warraaq, then ad-Daaruqutnee reported from him and considered him reliable. And adh-Dhahabee said about him: ((The Scholars of Hadeeth, the Imaam, the Proof)) and Yoosuf bin ‘Amr al-Qawwaas mentioned him from the reliable scholars. Look to Taareekh Baghdaad (6/300) of al-Khateeb al Baghdaadee and al-Muntadhim (6/278) of Ibnul Jawzee and Siyaar A’laam an-Nubalaa (15/74) of adh-Dhahabee.

And al-Hassan bin Muhammad bin as-Sabaah az-Za’faraanee is Reliable. See
Tahdheeb at-Tahdheeb (2/318) and at-Taqreeb (1/170) of Ibn Hajar al ‘Asqalaanee.

Comment: We hope the Rafidah(shiatu dajjal) have now found that where they will be in the hereafter, and surely its not paradise.

Ironically the brainless Shiatu dajjal after half quoting these narration stated:

[Quote] The presence of a high number of chains for this Hadith is sufficient evidence of its authenticity.[Quote]

Indeed, shiism(rafidism) and brain damage has a very close relation. The dajjali fools trying to counter our argument forgot that by misquoting narrations and try to authenticate it by their silly techniques, they were digging a grave for themselves. Praise be to Allah that by his help we have buried them in the grave they dug for others.

 

Now let us quote before you what was the view of Imams from Ahlebayt regarding Rafidah:

خالد بن حماد قال: حدثني الحسن بن طلحة رفعه، عن محمد بن إسماعيل عن علي بن يزيد الشامي قال: قال أبو الحسن (ع): قال أبو عبد الله (ع): ” ما أنزل الله سبحانه آية في المنافقين إلا وهي فيمن ينتحل التشيع

“Narrated Khalid bin Hammaad saying: narrated to me al-Hasan bin Talha (quoting) Muhammad bin Ismael, from Ali bin Yazeed al-Shaami saying: Abul-Hasan [as] said: Abu Abdullah [as] said: No verse revealed by Allah concerning hypocrites, but it perfectly fits those who are of Shi’a persuasion.”[Reported by al-Majlisi, Bihaar al-Anwaar, vol. 65, p. 66; Rijaal al-Kash-shy, p. 254, Ali Akbar al-Ghifary, Studies in the Science of Dirayah, p. 155; Rijaal at-Tusi, vol.2, p. 589; Mu’jam Rijaal al-Kho’ei, vol.15, p.265]

عَلِيُّ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ عِيسَى عَنْ بَعْضِ أَصْحَابِنَا عَنْ أَبِي الْحَسَنِ مُوسَى ( عليه السلام ) قَالَ إِنَّ اللَّهَ عَزَّ وَ جَلَّ غَضِبَ عَلَى الشِّيعَةِ فَخَيَّرَنِي نَفْسِي أَوْ هُمْ فَوَقَيْتُهُمْ وَ اللَّهِ بِنَفْسِي

“Narrated Ali bin Ibrahim, from Muhammad bin Issa, from some of our associates, from Abul-Hasan Musa [as] saying: Verily the Wrath of Allah befell on the Shi’ites, and He gave me the choice: Either myself or them, by Allah I shielded them by choosing myself.”[Reported by al-Kulainy, al-Kafi, vol. 1, p.260]

Ibn Hajar al-Haythamee also metioned in his Majma’ az-Zawaa’id (2/10) with a good chain of narration that ‘Aasim bin Bahdalah said:

قلت للحسن بن علي : الشيعة يزعمون أن عليًا يرجع ؟ قال : كذب أولئك

الكذابون، لو علمنا ذلك ما تزوج نساؤه، ولا قسمنا ميراثه

“I said to ‘al-Hasan bin ‘Alee: “The Shee’ah claim that ‘Alee will return.”He said: “Those LIARS have lied. For if we had known that, his women would not have married and we would not have divided his inheritance.”

جعفر الصادق : من زعم أني إمام معصوم مفترض الطاعة فأنا منه بريء

Ja’afar al-Sadiq (rah) said: “He who claims that I am an infallible Imam whose obedience is obligatory then tell him that I disassociate myself from him.“ sources: al-Mezzi mentioned it in “Tahtheeb al-Kamal” and al-Imam al-Dhahabi in “Siyar al-A’alam” 6/259, Abu Nasr Muhammad ibn ‘Abdullah al-Imam said in the commentary: Isnaduhu Hasan.

فُضَيْلُ بْنُ مَرْزُوقٍ ، قَالَ : سَمِعْتُ حَسَنَ بْنَ حَسَنٍ ، يَقُولُ لِرَجُلٍ مِنَ الرَّافِضَةِ : ” وَاللَّهِ إِنْ أَمْكَنَ اللَّهُ مِنْكُمْ لَنُقَطِّعَنَّ أَيْدِيَكُمْ وَأَرْجُلَكُمْ مِنْ خِلافٍ ، وَلا نَقْبَلُ مِنْكُمْ تَوْبَةً “
وَسَمِعْتُهُ يَقُولُ : ” مَرَقَتْ عَلَيْنَا الرَّافِضَةُ كَمَا مَرَقَتِ الْحَرُورِيَّةُ عَلَى عَلِيٍّ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ “

al-Fudayl ibn Marzuq said: I heard al-Hassan bin al-Hassan bin ‘Ali say to a Man from the Rafidah: “By Allah if it were up to us we would cut your hands and your feet from opposing sides and we would never accept your repentance.” I also heard him say: “We had to deal with the Rafidah as ‘Ali had to deal with the Hururiyah(Khawarij).“

source: al-Ajari in al-Sharia #2015, Abu Nasr Muhammad ibn ‘Abdullah al-Imam said in the commentary: Hasan.

More compliments reported for shias from their own Imams can be read here: Qualities of Shias as reported by Shias

 

Conclusion:

We hope that our readers weren’t surprised by finding such number of deceptions from Shiatu dajjal, because of the fact we have already stated in the beginning of our article. These deceptions were like just few drops from the ocean of deception of the religious deceivers. So we want to advice our readers to beware of deceptions of shiatu dajjal, which they try to commit using fabricated narrations or misinterpreting authentic narrations. And that never take any claim of shias for granted unless properly researched by asking people of knowledge(scholars from Ahlesunnah) regarding those, because remember that lying and deceiving  is in the teachings of this cult.

Lastly we Thank Allah the Almighty for his help, because without the help of Allah this series of refutations wouldn’t hav been possible

About these ads

One thought on “Part 7: Interpretation of Hadeeth Khalifatayn by RELIGIOUS DECEIVERS under Microscope

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s